Back

Genetic Interaction of APOE-E-4 and PICALM rs3851179 is Associated With Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Healthy Middle-Aged Adults at Risk for Alzheimer's Disease

Dharia, S. Y.; Valderrama, C. E.; Liu, Q.; Smith, S. D.

2025-12-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.16.693545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveThis study investigates whether dynamic functional connectivity (dFC) dwell-time patterns derived from resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) can distinguish Alzheimers disease (AD) genetic risk profiles, specifically the APOE-{varepsilon}4 (A+) and PICALM rs3851179 (P+) variants, in cognitively healthy, middle-aged adults. ApproachWe estimated recurring dFC clusters from rs-fMRI data and quantified the dwell-time (total duration spent in specific connectivity states) for three cohorts: not-at-risk, A+P-, and A+P+. To evaluate the utility of these temporal features, group differences in dwell-time profiles were assessed, and logistic regression with permutation testing was employed to classify genotypes based on dFC patterns. Main resultsIndividuals in at-risk groups (A+P- and A+P+) exhibited significantly reduced dwell-time in left-hemisphere hubs compared to the not-at-risk group, aligning with known left-hemisphere vulnerability in early AD progression. The logistic regression models achieved above-chance discrimination of genotypes, with permutation tests confirming a significant trend when distinguishing not-at-risk individuals from the combined at-risk cohorts. SignificanceThese findings suggest that the temporal dFC features are sensitive to subtle functional brain alterations linked to AD genetic risk before clinical symptoms appear. Dwell-time features represent a promising physiological marker for early risk stratification and warrant further validation in larger longitudinal datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/Shyamal-Dharia/APOE-PICALM-dFC-dwell-time.git.

Published in Journal of Neural Engineering · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.