Implementing Inclusive and Community-Driven AI for Health programs: Lessons from Frontier Technology Pilots in Developing Contexts
Moore, C.; Mugwagwa, J.; Vickers, I.
Show abstract
The use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare is a field of growing relevance and importance, but in many LMICs, those seeking to develop AI based solutions for healthcare needs, face significant outstanding challenges. This research analysed practical efforts to implement AI-based technologies to support healthcare delivery in low-resource settings. By investigating six pilots within the Foreign Commonwealth and Development Offices Frontier Technologies program through analysis of associated pilot literature and semi-structured interviews with key pilot actors, we identified differences and commonalities in the experiences of each pilot, and in the perceived enablers and barriers for effective implementation of AI health tools. We found that AI is a promising tool in this sector but currently lacks the operating environment to be widely successful in solving healthcare challenges. Gaps in regulatory and ethical governance in these contexts exacerbated concerns around the ethical and responsible use of AI and led to alternative technical approaches being followed. The value of partnerships and relationships was demonstrated as essential, and projects with pre-established networks with key decision makers in healthcare systems, both at a bureaucratic and clinical level, demonstrated greater success in both developing and scaling their solutions. The challenge of sustainability and longer-term impact was also identified. The fragmented nature of local technology ecosystems also posed a common barrier to the delivery and scale-up of promising AI tools. It is anticipated that this research can help share some useful lessons for future users and developers of AI technologies and tools in the health space, particularly in resource-constrained settings. These findings suggest that barriers to equitable AI adoption in low-resource settings are primarily institutional and systemic, rather than technical, highlighting the need for health system-level readiness alongside technological innovation. Author SummaryArtificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly promoted as a way to improve healthcare delivery, including in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, much of the existing discussion focuses on technical performance, with less attention to whether AI tools can be implemented, governed, and sustained within real-world health systems. In this study, we examine a set of AI-for-health pilot projects implemented in low-resource settings to understand what enables or constrains their adoption. Using interviews with practitioners and a review of project documentation, we explore how these pilots interacted with existing health system conditions, including workforce capacity, data infrastructure, governance arrangements, and institutional partnerships. We find that many of the challenges faced by AI projects are not primarily technical, but instead reflect broader system-level constraints, such as limited regulatory capacity, fragmented data systems, and reliance on external actors for development and maintenance. Our findings suggest that achieving equitable and inclusive AI for health requires more than developing effective technologies. It also requires sustained investment in the institutions, governance structures, and system capacities that allow AI tools to be safely adopted and integrated into health services. This study offers practical insights for policymakers, funders, and practitioners seeking to use AI in ways that strengthen health systems rather than bypass them.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Development and preliminary testing of Health Equity Across the AI Lifecycle (HEAAL): A framework for healthcare delivery organizations to mitigate the risk of AI solutions worsening health inequities 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- An evaluation of the introduction of telehealth for remote antenatal and postnatal contacts in Bangladesh and Lao People’s Democratic Republic during the COVID-19 pandemic 95%
- Exploring variations in the implementation of a health system level policy intervention to improve maternal and child health outcomes in resource limited settings: A qualitative multiple case study from Uganda 94%
- Stakeholder perspectives on the barriers and facilitators to integrating cardiovascular disease and diabetes management at primary care in Kenya 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Strengthening health service delivery and governance through institutionalizing ‘Urban Health Atlas’ - a geo-referenced Information Communication and Technology tool: lessons learned from an implementation research in three cities in Bangladesh 96%
- “Endless Opportunities”: A qualitative exploration of facilitators and barriers to scale-up of two-way texting follow-up after voluntary medical male circumcision in Zimbabwe 96%
- Process of Use of Evidence Products by Frontline Maternal, Newborn and Child Health Staff at the Facility Level in Ghana. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A double-edged sword - Telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: Findings from a global mixed methods study of healthcare providers 95%
- Lessons Learned From COVID-19 Modelling Efforts For Policy Decision-Making In Lower- And Middle-Income Countries 94%
- Designathons in Health Research: A Global Systematic Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging Telemedicine To Improve Mnch Uptake In Kenya: A Community- Based Hybrid Model 96%
- Implementing Home-Based Digital Health in Rural Canada: A Scoping Review 94%
- Human-supervised, large language model-based clinical decision support aligned to national newborn protocols in Kenya: a pragmatic, early-stage evaluation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.