Back

Place, Population, and Inequality: A Cross-Sectional National Analysis of Disparities in Neighborhood Physical Activity Environments Across the Urban-Rural Spectrum

Xiong, N.; Wan, N.; Wen, M.

2025-12-17 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.16.25342402 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesNeighborhood physical activity environments (PAEs)--including walkability, recreational facilities, green space, and civic infrastructure--support active living and population health but are often inequitably distributed. This study examines racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in neighborhood PAEs and assesses variation by urbanicity. MethodsWe used population-weighted ordinary least squares regression models with county fixed effects using the latest available 2018 data from 69,889 census tracts in the contiguous United States. Models assessed associations between racial/ethnic and poverty composition and four PAE dimensions--built, physical facilities, natural, and social environments. Sensitivity analyses compared models with and without county fixed effects and population weighting. Urbanicity-stratified models examined disparities across urban, suburban, town, rural, and mixed settings. ResultsNon-Hispanic White and low-poverty populations had greater access to PAEs across all domains, except that low-poverty populations lived in areas with lower walkability. Disparities were largest in urban and suburban areas. Rural high-poverty populations had more natural resources but less infrastructure and civic support. County-fixed effects reversed the walkability advantages for non-Hispanic Black observed in unadjusted models. ConclusionsPAE disparities disproportionately affect racial/ethnic minority and high-poverty populations, especially in urban areas. Findings support equity-focused, context-specific interventions for environmental justice in health policy.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.