Sociodemographic and educational influences on early clinical academic careers in UK medical graduates
Fletcher, E.; Gillespie, H.; Vance, G.; Petty-Saphon, K.; Harper, L.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo examine how sociodemographic and educational factors influence progression into early clinical academic careers among UK medical graduates, focusing on intercalation, Academic Foundation Programme (AFP) participation, and Pre-doctoral Fellowships (PFs). DesignRetrospective cohort study using linked national data from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED). SettingAll UK medical schools with graduates entering the UK Foundation Programme between 2017 and 2022. Participants32,580 graduates (25,290 standard-entry (SE); 7,290 graduate-entry (GE)). Main outcome measuresCompletion of an intercalated degree; application to and acceptance for AFP; application to and acceptance for a PF during specialty training. ResultsAmong SE graduates, 63.9% intercalated, 21.4% applied to AFP and 7.6% were accepted. Male, minority ethnic, privately educated, and less deprived graduates were more likely to intercalate; disability and higher deprivation were associated with lower intercalation. Intercalation, publications, high Education Performance Measure (EPM) scores and attendance at six-year programmes strongly predicted AFP application and acceptance. At PF stage, minority ethnic SE doctors were significantly less likely to be accepted (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.80, p < 0.001), despite similar application rates. AFP completion was the strongest predictor of PF progression (OR 7.82, 95% CI 6.68 to 9.15, p <0.001). GE graduates had similar AFP application (21.9%) and acceptance (6.3%) rates. Male, minority ethnic graduates were more likely to apply to the AFP, while low EPM scores reduced acceptance. Few sociodemographic factors predicted PF applications, although prior AFP acceptance strongly did. Interaction analyses showed GE status attenuated some disparities in AFP application, but reversed patterns observed for ethnicity in acceptance. ConclusionsEarly clinical academic progression is shaped by educational achievements and persistent sociodemographic inequalities. Equitable access to funded research opportunities during medical school is likely to strengthen and diversify the future clinical academic workforce.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 96%
- Making the Match or Breaking it? Values, Perceptions, and Obstacles of Trainees Applying into Physician-Scientist Training Programs 94%
- Medical student residency preferences and motivational factors: a longitudinal, single-institution perspective 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Balancing Act of Academic Clinical Fellows in UK Emergency Medicine: A Qualitative Study 93%
- Evaluating the impact of a pulse oximetry remote monitoring programme on mortality and healthcare utilisation in patients with covid-19 assessed in Accident and Emergency departments in England: a retrospective matched cohort study 92%
- Impact on all-cause mortality of a case prediction and prevention intervention designed to reduce secondary care utilisation: findings from a randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Citizenship status and career self-efficacy: An intersectional study of biomedical trainees in the United States 94%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 93%
- Learn!Bio - A time-limited cross-sectional study on biosciences students' pathway to resilience during and post the Covid-19 pandemic at an UK university from 2020-2023 and insights into future teaching approaches. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 94%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 93%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Examination of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) Usage Guidelines for Scholarly Publishing in Medical Journals 90%
- Projected geographic disparities in healthcare worker absenteeism from COVID-19 school closures and the economic feasibility of child care subsidies: a simulation study 89%
- Describing the population experiencing COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough following second vaccination in England: A cohort study from OpenSAFELY 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.