Back

Challenges and opportunities for monitoring diet and physical activity in younger adults as part of a future brain health study: A UK and US Survey

Shannon, O. M.; Griffiths, A.; Matu, J.; Cronin, K.; Bridgeman, K.; Booi, L.; Farina, F.; Gregory, S.

2025-12-17 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.16.25342370 medRxiv
Show abstract

AimYoung adulthood is a formative life stage during which modifiable behaviours including diet and physical activity (PA) can have lasting impacts on brain health. However, this age group remains understudied in dementia research. This study aimed to explore how younger adults track their diet and PA, and evaluated attitudes, barriers, and enablers to different assessment tools. Subject and methodsAn online questionnaire assessed diet and PA tracking behaviours, attitudes, and barriers/enablers in younger adults (18-39 years) across the UK and US. Responses were compared between countries, ages, sexes, and ethnicities. Results1006 younger adults (UK n=500, US n=506) participated, with 90.3% reporting they would be likely/very likely to participate in a study exploring lifestyle and brain health. Remote technology-based data collection methods, particularly apps and smartwatches, were widely acceptable. Most participants were willing to provide annual dietary and activity data. Key diet-tracking barriers included estimating portion sizes and tracking outside the home. Key PA-tracking barriers included day-to-day variability and forgetting to record activity. Enablers included receiving incentives and using passive tracking methods. Participants from the US, of a minority ethnic group or aged 18-29 years reported greater barriers to tracking. ConclusionsYounger adults are interested in participating in brain health research and find technology-based diet and PA tracking acceptable in this context. Addressing identified barriers will be key to building a diverse, scalable cohort. Pilot testing is now needed to optimise feasibility and engagement. These findings will inform the design of a future brain health-focussed cohort study.

Published in Journal of Public Health (predicted rank #11) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.