Back

A sparse proteomic risk score incorporating plasma MMP12 level improves prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm

Clark, M. G.; Yuan, S.; Larsson, S. C.; Levin, M. G.; Woerner, J.; Kim, D.; Damrauer, S. M.

2025-12-18 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2025.12.16.25341932 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundScreening criteria for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are based on clinical factors, such as age and smoking history, but do not include biological factors that may better reflect disease pathogenesis. ObjectivesWe sought to determine whether a proteomic risk score (ProRS) incorporating plasma protein abundance could improve prediction of AAA. MethodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of nearly 37,000 participants in the UK Biobank Pharma Proteomics Project with plasma protein abundance data for 274 cardiometabolic proteins. ProRS models were developed using regularized regression. ResultsThe generated sparse ProRS contained well-established clinical risk factors as well as a single protein - matrix metalloproteinase 12 (MMP12). Overall performance and discriminatory utility of this model was higher than an identical model without MMP12 (difference in Brier score 2.1 x 10-4, 95% CrI 2.0-2.3 x 10-4; difference in AUROC 0.021, 95% CrI 0.020 - 0.022). Within the cohort, current AAA screening recommendations applied to 4.6% of the population and captured 30% of cases, whereas screening 4.6% of the population at highest risk by ProRS captured 52% of cases. Among individuals with incident AAA, MMP12 abundance was independently associated with time to rupture or repair (HR 1.86, 95% CI 1.39-2.50, p < 0.001). Additionally, MMP12 level improved discrimination of AAA in an external cohort (SIMPLER; difference in AUROC 0.084, 95% CrI 0.081 - 0.087). ConclusionsA biologically-plausible ProRS incorporating a single matrix metalloproteinase improved prediction of AAA over clinical factors alone. These results may be used to enhance screening strategies for AAA.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.