Bacterial, fungal and protist communities affect differentially in succession stage of karst soil
Mao, L.-C.; Hu, G.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Hu, C.; Xu, C.-H.; Gan, Y.-H.
Show abstract
Karst soil microbial communities are major drivers of cycling of soil nutrients that sustain plant growth and productivity. Yet, a holistic understanding of the impact of different succession stage on the karst soil microbiome is still pooly understood. Here, we used a field experiment to investigate the loog-term consequences of changes in succession stage: rocky desertification(RD), grassland(GL), shrubs(SH), forest plantation(FP) and natural forest(NF) based on plant frequency on bacteria, protist and fungal communites. We showed that the shannon index of bacteria and fungi were higher in NF compared to GL, while protist shannon index was higher in SH that GL. The bacterial simpson_e index in NF and PF were higher than that in GL, SH and RD, howerer fungal and protist simpson_e index were similar across the five succession stages. Significant differences were observed in observed outs and phylogenetic diversity index in NF, SH were higher than GL, RD for fungi and protist, whereas bacterial observed outs and phylogenetic diversity index were relatively similar in five succession stage. The five succession stage differed markedly in the compositions of bacterial, fungi and protist communities. In bacterial, dominant phyla were Actinobacteriota, Proteoprotist, Acidobacteriota. Protist communities were dominated by Phragmoplastophyta, Arthropoda phyla. Regarding protist taxa, the dominant phyla were Ascomycota and Basidiomycota. Our findings provided evidence indicating that the microbial community compositions of RD, GL, SH, PF, and NF have their respective characteristics. These characteristics stem from differences in vegetation coverage, plant debris, root formation and other factors, leading to changes in the diversity and taxonomic group of bacteria, fungi and protists at different successional stages. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive perspective, showing the differences in microbial communities at different successional stages in karst soil.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enzyme stoichiometry indicates the variation of microbial nutrient requirements at different soil depths in subtropical forests 98%
- Divulging diazotrophic bacterial community structure in Kuwait desert ecosystems and their N2-fixation potential 96%
- The ectomycorrhizal community of urban linden trees in Gdansk, Poland 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bacterial and fungal communities are differentially modified by melatonin in agricultural soils under abiotic stress 96%
- Temporal and spatial changes in phyllosphere microbiome of acacia trees growing in super arid environments 96%
- Wine terroir and the soil microbiome: an amplicon sequencing-based assessment of the Barossa Valley and its sub-regions 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Landscape scale ecology of Tetracladium spp. fungal root endophytes 95%
- Keystone Bacterial Taxa Drive Denitrification and N2O Emission via Adaptive Genomic and Metabolic Strategies in Contrasting Agricultural Soils 95%
- Soil, senescence and exudate utilisation: Characterisation of the Paragon var. spring bread wheat root microbiome 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Organic manure managements increases soil microbial community structure and diversity in double-cropping paddy field of Southern China 97%
- Mapping of long-term impact of conventional and organic soil management on resident and active fractions of rhizosphere communities of barley (Hordeum vulgare) 96%
- The Soil Microbiome of the Caatinga Drylands in Brazil 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Dynamics in microbial communities associated with the development of soil fatigue in banana 97%
- Methanotrophic Community Detected by DNA-SIP at Bertioga Mangrove Area, Southeast Brazil 94%
- How benthic sediment microbial communities respond to glyphosate and its metabolite: A microcosm experiment 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.