Back

Asymmetrical glycoengineering of monoclonal antibodies: new insights in a-gal immunogenicity

Bosman, G. P.; Ehlers, A.; Buckley, T.; Dobruchowska, J.; Torano, J. S.; Bentlage, A. E. H.; Vidarsson, G.; Boons, G.-J.

2025-12-17 biochemistry
10.64898/2025.12.15.694461 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Glycosylation heterogeneity in therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) necessitates precise glycoengineering to optimize effector functions, such as those mediated by Fc{gamma}-receptors (Fc{gamma}Rs). Current enzymatic remodeling methods are limited in scope, producing only a narrow spectrum of glycoforms and struggling to achieve complete control over the synthesis of defined asymmetrical structures, which are often critical for enhanced mAb efficacy. We report a multi-step, fully enzymatic platform for the solution-phase synthesis of a comprehensive library of biantennary mAb glycoforms with complete control over the 1,3- and 1,6-mannose arm architecture. The strategy relies on two key catalytic steps: the use of the single domain of the {beta}-N-acetylglucosaminidase StrH (GH20-2) to achieve the regioselective hydrolysis of the GlcNAc residue on the 1,3-mannose arm of the intact antibody, thereby introducing asymmetry; and exploiting the intrinsic, broad acceptor flexibility of GnT-I to reinstall the 1,3-mannose arm GlcNAc even after the 1,6-mannose arm has been selectively extended and terminally capped with Neu5Ac or the -gal epitope. This robust, two-stage enzymatic remodeling methodology, demonstrated on infliximab and cetuximab, unlocks the complete chemical space of biantennary Fc-glycans for comprehensive, functional studies. We employed these well-defined glycovariants to determine the minimum structural requirements for anti--gal IgE binding and systematically evaluate binding affinities toward Fc{gamma}Rs, providing essential insights for the rational design of next-generation immunotherapeutics.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.