Back

MOPRs in mouse islets of Langerhans modulate cell signaling and secretion

Keith, M.; Stander, C.; De Gregorio, D.; Huang, A.; Townsend, S.; Sheybani-Deloui, S.; Zigman, J.; Hughes, J.; Castro, D. C.

2025-12-17 pharmacology and toxicology
10.64898/2025.12.15.694418 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Article highlightsO_LIMu opioid receptors are expressed on multiple islets of Langerhans cell types C_LIO_LIMu opioid receptors on islets engage canonical Gi signaling cascades in islets C_LIO_LIMu opioid receptors on islets modulate calcium influx and oscillations C_LIO_LIMu opioid receptors on islets modulate insulin and glucagon secretion. C_LI Most clinically and recreationally used opioids drugs act on the endogenous mu opioid receptor (MOPR). While MOPR is typically studied in the context of addiction and analgesia, decades of evidence indicates that they have a strong modulatory role on metabolism and glycemia. However, whether these effects are directly driven by MOPR actions on pancreatic islets remains poorly understood. Here we sought to comprehensively profile MOPRs on islets to assess how their activity shapes cellular physiology and secretion. First, we used RNA-seq, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and immunoblotting approaches to map islet expression. We observed robust expression of MOPR across multiple cell types in islets. Next, using a FRET-based approach, we show that MOPRs recruit canonical inhibitory pathways, reducing cAMP accumulation. Correspondingly, islets from constitutive MOPR knockout mice showed increased calcium influx and oscillations. However, MOPR knockout had no effect on insulin secretion, instead increase glucagon secretion. Surprisingly, while MOPR antagonism increased overall calcium, it reduced calcium oscillations and suppressed insulin secretion. By contrast MOPR agonism suppressed calcium, increased oscillations, and had no effect on overall hormone secretion. Collectively, these results suggest that MOPR can profoundly shape islet activity, with these effects likely driven by their actions on distinct cell types.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.