Implicit adaptations effect on sensorimotor and motor confidence
Evans, M. H.; Taylor, J. A.; Landy, M. S.
Show abstract
Sensorimotor adaptation maintains movement accuracy by counteracting perturbations or miscalibrations. It can operate explicitly, by consciously adjusting motor plans to correct errors, or implicitly, by automatically recalibrating sensorimotor mappings without altering the motor plan. While explicit adaptation is known to reduce sensorimotor confidence--the perceived likelihood of successful action--it is unclear whether implicit adaptation similarly affects confidence in sensorimotor judgments or motor awareness (knowledge of ones own limb position). To investigate this, participants made reaching movements to visual targets without seeing their hand. Cursor feedback followed an "error-clamped" trajectory: its radial position matched the hand, but its angular direction was fixed and independent of actual hand direction, a manipulation participants were told to ignore. The clamp direction varied sinusoidally over trials ({+/-}10{degrees}; 12 cycles per session). Participants reported confidence by adjusting the size of an arc centered on the target or, in another task, centered on reported reach direction; larger arcs indicated lower confidence. Points were awarded when the arc encompassed the true reach direction, with fewer points for larger arcs, encouraging accurate and meaningful confidence reports. Fourier analysis of reach and report time series revealed a strong 12-cycle component in both, demonstrating robust implicit adaptation and corresponding changes in motor awareness. These findings indicate that although implicit adaptation operates unconsciously, the resulting mismatch between motor plans and proprioceptive signals can bias judgments of reach outcomes. However, confidence judgments were not consistently affected, suggesting that sensorimotor confidence and confidence in proprioceptive awareness may rely on partially distinct mechanisms. New & NoteworthyThis work is among the first to look at how implicit adaptation influences meta-judgments regarding motor execution and internal states. It identifies a dissociation between sensorimotor confidence and motor-awareness confidence.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evidence for an efferent-based prediction contributing to implicit motor adaptation 97%
- Motor Learning Without Moving: Proprioceptive and Predictive Hand Localization After Passive Visuoproprioceptive Discrepancy Training 97%
- Asymmetry in kinematic generalisation between visual and passive lead-in movements are consistent with a forward model in the sensorimotor system 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended practice improves the accuracy and efficiency of goal-directed reaching guided by supplemental kinesthetic vibrotactile feedback 97%
- Implicit reward-based motor learning 97%
- Contribution of Implicit Memory to Adaptation of Movement Extent During Reaching Against Unpredictable Spring-Like Loads: Insensitivity to Intentional Suppression of Kinematic Performance 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.