Attention to Psuedo-Tone Melodies Enhances Cortical but Not Brainstem Responses in Humans
Figarola, V.; Li, Y.; Tierney, A. T.; Dick, F.; Noyce, A.; Maddox, R. K.; Shinn-Cunningham, B. G.
Show abstract
Auditory selective attention, the ability to focus on specific sounds while ignoring competitors, enables communication in complex soundscapes. Though attention clearly modulates cortical responses to sound, whether and where this modulation occurs in subcortical structures remains disputed. Here, we use electroencephalography to record cortical and subcortical (auditory brainstem responses, ABRs) activity during a selective attention task. Human participants attend to a 3-note melody in one pitch range presented to one ear while ignoring a competing, interleaved melody in a different pitch range played to the other ear (Laffere et al., 2020, 2021). The melodies consist of pitch-evoking pseudo-tones formed by convolving a periodic impulse train with a brief tone pip. These stimuli allow us to measure both ABRs (elicited by each individual tone pip within a pseudo-note) and cortical responses (elicited by the onsets of pseudo-notes) simultaneously. We observed robust ABRs, but no evidence of modulation by attention. Conversely, cortical responses, measured by event related potentials (ERPs), demonstrated attentional modulation of the P1-N1 peak. We conclude that attentional modulation within the brainstem is not measurable in the well-defined peaks of the ABR, which themselves reflect processing up to the input stage to the inferior colliculus.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Isolating neural signatures of conscious speech perception with a no-report sine-wave speechparadigm 98%
- Salience-dependent disruption of sustained auditory attention can be inferred from evoked pupil responses and neural tracking of task-irrelevant sounds 97%
- Direct cochlear recordings in humans show a theta rhythmic modulation of the auditory nerve by selective attention 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention 98%
- Cross-modal interactions at the audiovisual cocktail-party revealed by behavior, ERPs, and neural oscillations 97%
- Attention reinforces human corticofugal system to aid speech perception in noise 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of stimulus rate and periodicity on auditory cortical entrainment to continuous sounds 98%
- Individualized Assays of Temporal Coding in the Ascending Human Auditory System 97%
- Individual Differences in Cognition and Perception Predict Neural Processing of Speech in Noise for Audiometrically Normal Listeners. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Consonance perception in congenital amusia: behavioral and brain responses to harmonicity and beating cues 97%
- Implicit versus explicit timing - separate or shared mechanisms? 96%
- Beat-based and memory-based temporal expectations in rhythm: similar perceptual effects, different underlying mechanisms 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural Alpha Oscillations and Auditory Steady State Responses During Adaptation to a Cochlear Implant 97%
- Expectations boost the reconstruction of auditory features from electrophysiological responses to noisy speech 97%
- Irrelevant Predictions: Distractor Rhythmicity Modulates Neural Encoding in Auditory Cortex 97%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.