Back

Spatial gene expression maps in vertebrate limbs display conserved and regenerative species-specific features within connective tissue

McMann, C. L.; Park, C.; Cloutier, J. K.; Reddien, P.

2025-12-17 developmental biology
10.64898/2025.12.15.694399 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Regeneration is widespread but sparsely distributed throughout the animal kingdom. Identifying factors that differentiate regenerative and non-regenerative organisms could enable approaches for improving regenerative outcomes in non-regenerative species. Constitutive adult positional information can be required for regeneration, but has been poorly characterized across animal species. Here, we generated positional gene expression atlases for the limbs of one regenerative (axolotl) and one non-regenerative (mouse) vertebrate. Regional gene expression signatures in both species are highly overlapping and mirror multiple developmental positional information patterns, particularly along the primary limb axis. These expression signatures are largely harbored in connective tissue, including diverse fibroblast types, in both organisms. We also identified species-specific regional expression patterns, including for Proxima, a novel gene encoding a secreted factor with strong positional expression in axolotl. Positional gene expression similar to developmental patterns also exists between fore and hindlimbs and along anterior-posterior and dorsal-ventral limb axes, but is notably stronger in axolotl than in mouse. Our results demonstrate that regenerative and non-regenerative vertebrate limbs share many, but not all, signatures of positional information. This work establishes regional atlases of adult vertebrate limbs and suggests that the connective tissue of regenerative and non-regenerative vertebrate limbs share a conserved signature of positional information that is stronger in regenerative species.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.