Back

Comparative genomics of epiphytic and endophytic bacterial culture collections from Arabidopsis thaliana in Otautahi (Christchurch), Aotearoa New Zealand

Miebach, M.; Schlechter, R. O.; Jiang, R.; Weavers, C.; Oso, S.; Stocks, C. F.; Marjaya, M.; Kear, E.; Hirsch, S.; Oeltjen, M.; Voirol, L. R. P.; Stott, M. B.; MSc course Leaf surface microbiology 2021-2025, ; Remus-Emsermann, M. N. P.

2025-12-14 microbiology
10.64898/2025.12.14.694188 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial culture collections are essential resources for exploring the diversity of microorganisms and their interactions with each other and their hosts. Here, we report on the sequencing of the first 129 bacterial isolates, representing 34 genera, from a culture collection of more than 600 bacterial strains originally isolated from leaves of a naturalised Arabidopsis thaliana population from [O]tautahi (Christchurch), Aotearoa New Zealand. Epiphytic (leaf surface), and endophytic (apoplastic) bacteria were isolated separately from the same leaves, providing complementary insights into both compartments. The recovered isolates encompass the dominant taxa typically associated with the Arabidopsis phyllosphere, including Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Methylobacterium, and Flavobacterium. Their full genome assemblies (BUSCO average completeness > 99%, checkM average completeness > 97% and average contamination < 1%) were analysed and compared to assess genomic features across epiphytic and endophytic lineages. While the epiphytic and endophytic strain collections did not show large genomic differences, certain functional categories differ, such as terpene biosynthesis and biofilm formation being enriched in epiphytic strains, while arginine biosynthesis and carbohydrate degradation were associated with endophytic strains. These data provide a genomic foundation for future experimental work on leaf-associated microbial ecology and plant-microbe interactions. To our knowledge, this is the first Arabidopsis leaf culture collection established from a Southern Hemisphere source.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ISME Communications
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
3
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
4
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
5
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
6
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
8
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.9%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
14
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
15
Microbiological Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
17
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
18
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
19
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
20
Phytobiomes Journal
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
22
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
23
Nature Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Plant and Soil
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
29
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%