Back

Influences of Nutri-Grade front-of-pack labels on the consumption of sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages: moderating roles of the food environment and age

Wang, C.-W.; Chong, M. F.-F.; Ma, P.; Dickens, B. L.; Shou, Y.

2025-12-16 nutrition
10.64898/2025.12.14.25342245 medRxiv
Show abstract

Front-of-pack nutrition labels (FOPLs) have been adopted as a key government strategy to address the significant burden of diet-related noncommunicable diseases. However, research on public knowledge and perceptions of FOPLs and their relationships with sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) and artificially sweetened beverage (ASB) consumption remains limited. A cross-sectional study with 2870 individuals was conducted to explore their knowledge and perceptions of Nutri-Grade, a national front-of-pack nutrition labeling scheme introduced in Singapore in 2022. Knowledge was not significantly associated with SSB consumption; however, individuals who perceived these labels more positively were significantly less likely to consume SSBs daily (AOR=0.72, p<0.001) and consumed fewer types of SSBs weekly (IRR=0.91, p<0.001). Moderation analyses indicated that greater knowledge of Nutri-Grade FOPLs was associated with a higher likelihood of SSB consumption among younger individuals and those residing in areas with higher house prices. Additionally, individuals with positive perceptions were more likely to consume SSBs daily when living in areas with food court density exceeding 2.99 per km{superscript 2} (AOR = 1.12, p = 0.004). Individuals with positive perceptions of Nutri-Grade FOPL were also less likely to consume ASBs (AOR=0.69, p<0.001), whereas, in contrast to SSBs, greater knowledge of Nutri-Grade FOPLs was associated with increased ASB consumption (AOR=1.42, p<0.001). These findings indicate that informational labeling itself is insufficient to change consumption behavior. Although positive perceptions of Nutri-Grade FOPLs provide a protective effect, this effect diminishes when the food environment is taken into account.

Published in Food Quality and Preference · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.