Unmasking Hidden Dysglycemia: A Mobile OGTT Approach Using Continuous Glucose Monitors
Singh, K.; Esteve, L.; North, P.; Beason, A.; Hershkovich, L.; Chen, B.; Islam, S. M. M.; Bent, B.; Cho, P.; Wang, W. K.; Shandhi, M. M. H.; Snyder, M.; Metwally, A. A.; Crowley, M. J.; Alexopoulos, A.-S.; Dunn, J.
Show abstract
Prediabetes (PD), which includes impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), is a dysfunctional metabolic state that often progresses to type 2 diabetes (T2D). Standard screening tools such as random glucose and hemoglobin A1c frequently miss early or intermittent dysglycemia and cannot distinguish underlying physiological differences relevant for targeted intervention. Although the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) detects more PD and T2D and identifies high-risk individuals earlier, its clinical use is limited by the need for repeated venous sampling and in-clinic administration. We introduce the mobile OGTT (mOGTT), which leverages continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to capture high-resolution glycemic responses to a standardized glucose challenge outside clinical settings. In a population spanning a broad range of glycemic health, we establish preliminary normative mOGTT values, characterize their relationship to clinical OGTT thresholds, and assess concordance with A1c. We show that CGM-derived analogs of OGTT metrics improve detection and phenotyping of dysglycemia and propose the Glucose Challenge Response Index (GCRI), a composite measure of glycemic health. Finally, we demonstrate the generalizability of GCRI-based subphenotypes in an out-of-sample cohort. These results help facilitate an efficient and scalable approach for conveniently detecting and quantifying early-stage glucose dysregulation.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 93%
- The power of TOPMed imputation for the discovery of Latino enriched rare variants associated with type 2 diabetes 92%
- Skeletal muscle and intermuscular adipose tissue gene expression profiling identifies new biomarkers with prognostic significance for insulin resistance progression and intervention response 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic review of precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes 93%
- Using Genomic Context Informed Genotype Data and Within-model Ancestry Adjustment to Classify Type 2 Diabetes 91%
- Estimating Heritability of Glycaemic Response to Metformin using Nationwide Electronic Health Records and Population-Sized Pedigree 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impacts of COVID-19 on glycemia and risk of diabetic ketoacidosis 93%
- MODY is prevalent in later-onset diabetes, has potential for targeted therapy but is challenging to identify 92%
- Characterizing common and rare variations in non-traditional glycemic biomarkers using multivariate approaches on multi-ancestry ARIC study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Poor in-utero growth, reduced beta cell secretion and high plasma glucose in childhood are harbingers of glucose intolerance in young Indians 92%
- Early metabolic features of genetic liability to type 2 diabetes: cohort study with repeated metabolomics across early life 92%
- Accounting for age-related increases in HbA1c more accurately quantifies risk of Type 1 Diabetes progression in islet autoantibody-positive adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Organ-specific metabolic pathways distinguish prediabetes, type 2 diabetes and normal tissues 90%
- Longitudinal Metabolomics of Human Plasma Reveals Robust Prognostic Markers of COVID-19 Disease Severity 89%
- Insulin and Exercise-induced Phosphoproteomics of Human Skeletal Muscle Identify REPS1 as a New Regulator of Muscle Glucose Uptake 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.