Back

Peripheral regeneration of Aβ low-threshold mechanoreceptors is limited despite activation of regenerative transcriptional pathways

Bolivar, S.; Martinez-Mateu, N.; Ovelleiro, D.; Udina, E.

2025-12-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.13.691790 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Peripheral neurons can regenerate after nerve injury, yet functional recovery is often incomplete due to non-specific or incomplete target reinnervation. Among sensory neuron subtypes, A{beta} low-threshold mechanoreceptors (A{beta}-LTMRs) mediate discriminative touch, a modality often incompletely restored after nerve injury. However, the mechanisms governing A{beta}-LTMR regeneration remain largely unexplored. Here, we characterised the anatomical and transcriptional features of A{beta}-LTMRs regeneration after nerve injury. We assessed the extent of axonal regeneration after sciatic nerve crush and the preferential regeneration following femoral nerve transection using Calb1-Cre/tdTomato reporter mice. In both models, regeneration was incomplete, failing to reach control values. Moreover, A{beta}-LTMRs preferentially reinnervated cutaneous rather than muscle pathways. To define the molecular program underlying this response, we performed ribosome-bound RNA sequencing from Calb1-Cre/Ribotag mice 7 days after nerve crush. A{beta}-LTMRs upregulated canonical regeneration-associated genes, including Atf3, Sprr1a, Gal, and Gap43. Comparison with published RNA-seq datasets from other sensory neuron populations revealed only modest overlap, indicating that the core injury response shared between neurons is accompanied by a neuron subtype-specific programme. Together, these findings define the regenerative profile of A{beta}-LTMRs across anatomical and transcriptomic levels, revealing the limited regenerative capacity of this neuron subpopulation despite robust activation of classical regeneration-associated genes.

Published in The Journal of Physiology · training set

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.