Back

Clinical and Epidemiological Characteristics of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Retrospective Study

Boulahia, M.

2025-12-15 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2025.12.13.25342186 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition among multiparous and postmenopausal women. In North Africa, delayed gynecological consultation often results in presentation at advanced stages requiring surgical management. ObjectiveTo describe the clinical profile, surgical management, and short-term postoperative outcomes of women undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse at a tertiary care hospital in Algiers, Algeria. MethodsA retrospective descriptive cohort study was conducted including 31 women who underwent surgical treatment for POP between January 2022 and December 2023. Data collected from medical records included age, parity, menopausal status, type and stage of prolapse, presenting symptoms, surgical procedures performed, and early postoperative outcomes. Descriptive statistics were applied. ResultsThe mean age was 63.2 years (range 47-80), and the mean parity was 5.7. Most patients were postmenopausal (87%). Multicompartment prolapse was observed in 87% of cases, with stage III prolapse predominating. Vaginal hysterectomy with anterior and posterior colporrhaphy (VH + APR) was the most frequently performed procedure (58%). Early postoperative outcomes were favorable, with 90% of patients experiencing no major complications. Minor complications included transient urinary retention and mild infections, managed conservatively. The average hospital stay ranged from 3 to 5 days. ConclusionIn this cohort, pelvic organ prolapse predominantly affected older, multiparous, postmenopausal women and commonly presented at advanced stages. Vaginal surgical management, particularly VH + APR, was associated with satisfactory short-term outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of preventive strategies and earlier gynecological consultation in resource-limited settings.

Published in Batna Journal of Medical Sciences (BJMS) · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.