Orientation-tuned surround suppression exhibits a unique laminar signature in human primary visual cortex
Emerson, J. H.; Navarro, K.; Olman, C. A.
Show abstract
Spatial context modifies visual perception by enhancing novel and salient features over spatially redundant features in the underlying neural code of primary visual cortex (V1). Although multiple intracortical pathways contribute to contextual modulation, their specific contributions to different types of contextual modulation are not fully understood. Leveraging the distinct laminar connectivity patterns of feedforward, feedback, and lateral pathways, we used ultra-high-resolution fMRI (7T T2*-weighted, 0.6 mm isotropic resolution) to infer their relative contributions to contextual modulation in V1 by analyzing blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) signal across cortical depth. Participants viewed sine-wave grating disks embedded in large surround gratings. Segmentation cues were introduced or removed by manipulating the relative phase and orientation of the surround gratings, yielding three contextual conditions and a surround-only condition to measure the effects of context in the absence of feedforward input. Our analysis isolated the effects of orientation-tuned surround suppression (OTSS) from orientation-independent border-induced modulation (BIM). The results show that BOLD laminar profiles differ by modulation type: BIM affected both deep and superficial voxels, while OTSS was absent in deep voxels. We also find that voxels at all depths are driven by spatial context in the absence of feedforward input, which accords with the discovery of contextually-driven neural responses in mammalian V1. These laminar differences likely reflect distinct contributions of feedback from higher-order visual areas and long-range lateral connections within V1. Our findings help to explicate the contributions of recurrent processing in visual contextual modulation and demonstrate the participation of lateral pathways in laminar-dependent BOLD fMRI. Significance StatementContextual modulation integrates visual information across spatial scales, guided by intracortical lateral and feedback connections in primary visual cortex (V1). However, the independent contributions of these pathways to distinct contextual phenomena remain unclear. Using laminar functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we investigated how these pathways process different types of contextual features. Blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) laminar profiles varied with the type of visual context, indicating distinct intracortical pathways are involved in processing specific contextual features. These findings enhance our understanding of the mechanisms underlying human vision and provide evidence that V1-intrinsic lateral connections exhibit unique laminar signatures in the BOLD signal.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mesoscale functional organization and connectivity of color, disparity, and naturalistic texture in human second visual area 98%
- High resolution quantitative and functional MRI indicate lower myelination of thin and thick stripes in human secondary visual cortex 97%
- Visual working memories are abstractions of percepts 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Attention enhances category representations across the brain with strengthened residual correlations to ventral temporal cortex 97%
- A cortical hierarchy of localized and distributed processes revealed via dissociation of task activations, connectivity changes, and intrinsic timescales 96%
- Topographic Signatures of Global Object Perception in Human Visual Cortex 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Basis of executive functions in fine-grained architecture of cortical and subcortical human brain networks 96%
- Extended frontal networks for visual and auditory working memory 96%
- Sulcal depth in medial ventral temporal cortex predicts the location of a place-selective region in macaques, children, and adults. 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.