Back

Cognitive state dependent enhancement of cognitive control with transcranial magnetic stimulation

McInnes, A. N.; Pipia, V. L.; Maynard, K. L.; Kalender, G.; Widge, A. S.

2025-12-16 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.12.694061 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), yet variability of therapeutic responses remains high. A key contributor to this variability may be state-dependent effects of brain stimulation, where activity in underlying circuits can shape the propagation of TMS-evoked activity. Thus, pushing target circuits into a desired state by engaging cognition may sensitise those circuits to TMS-evoked plasticity. We tested whether TMS effects on cognitive control, a transdiagnostic construct implicated across psychiatric disorders and a putative mediator of TMS efficacy, are state-dependent. Participants (N = 25) completed a context-dependent behavioural assay of cognitive control before and after we delivered rTMS to the prefrontal cortex (PFC). During rTMS, participants performed either the cognitive control task (active-state TMS), or performed a context-independent perceptual task (control-state TMS). We assessed changes in downstream behavioural metrics of circuit function, as well as neural indices of cognitive control measured from electroencephalography (EEG). rTMS enhanced cognitive control performance only when PFC-anchored control circuits were actively engaged during stimulation. Similarly, only active-state TMS modulated theta band oscillatory activity, which is thought to be a marker of cognitive control engagement. Moreover, modulation of those EEG indices by TMS predicted gains in behavioural performance in the cognitive control task. These findings demonstrate that TMS effects on cognitive control are state-dependent, in which endogenous engagement of PFC-anchored networks can shape the magnitude and functional relevance of TMS-induced plasticity. Considering cognitive states during TMS may therefore offer a framework to enhance and/or accelerate TMS therapeutic effects.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.4%
2
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.1%
3
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
5
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.9%
7
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
9
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
Journal of Psychiatric Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
13
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
14
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
15
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
European Neuropsychopharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
17
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.7%
19
Nature Mental Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%