Back

Cell Barcoding Reveals Lineage-dependent Outcomes in hiPSC Cardiac Differentiation

Sohn, S.; Morgan, D.; Callahan, C.; Dockery, K.; Brock, A.; Zoldan, J.

2025-12-16 bioengineering
10.64898/2025.12.12.694049 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (hiPSC-CMs) have potential applications in treating cardiovascular disease but are currently limited in their clinical translation. A primary limitation is the poor clinical scalability of hiPSC-CMs, with the heterogeneity of hiPSC cardiac differentiation significantly contributing to this limitation. We hypothesize that clinical scalability can be improved by tracking and controlling hiPSC clonal heterogeneity, a variable often overlooked in current differentiation approaches. "Fate priming", wherein clonal lineage identity determines differentiation fate, has been demonstrated in other stem cell differentiation pathways. We investigated fate priming in hiPSC cardiac differentiation using the ClonMapper cell barcoding platform to label, track, and isolate distinct hiPSC lineages from the same cell line. We show that certain hiPSC lineages preferentially differentiate into hiPSC-CMs or non-CMs. After isolating lineages with apparent fate priming, we found significant differences in cardiac differentiation outcomes between these single-clone populations and heterogeneous, multi-clone hiPSC populations. These findings indicate that lineage identity influences hiPSC cardiac differentiation outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTCardiovascular disease is a significant global health concern that can be addressed by engineering artificial tissues to develop new treatments for heart disease or to directly replace damaged heart tissue. Stem cells are a useful tool for engineering these tissues because of their ability to become cardiomyocytes. However, their clinical translation is limited by variability in the process of differentiating stem cells into cardiomyocytes. This article reports findings that show different lineages of genetically identical human induced pluripotent stem cells have different capacities for differentiating into cardiomyocytes, which may contribute to the variability observed.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stem Cell Reports
118 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
2
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.1%
3
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.8%
6
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
7
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 21%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 29%
3.2%
11
npj Regenerative Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
12
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.9%
15
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.6%
16
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.5%
19
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.3%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Nature Cardiovascular Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
24
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Stem Cells
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%