Back

evo3D: a generalised framework for structure-informed evolutionary analysis, implemented in R

Broyles, B. K.; He, Q.

2025-12-14 bioinformatics
10.64898/2025.12.12.694041 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Selection pressures often act at the level of protein structure, yet most evolutionary analyses remain confined to linear sequences. Early structure-informed approaches improved interpretation by mapping single-site metrics onto protein structures, and later methods introduced 3D sliding windows to capture spatial neighbourhoods missed by linear analyses. These frameworks, however, are restricted to predefined statistics and narrowly defined 3D window types, limiting the scope of questions that can be addressed. We developed an R package, evo3D, a generalised framework for structure-informed evolutionary analysis that supports any downstream statistic and scales from simple to complex structures. evo3D extracts structure-informed multiple sequence alignment subsets (spatial haplotypes), making the structure-informed unit of analysis directly available to users. The framework provides fixed-count and fixed-distance spatial windows, supports residue and codon analysis modes, and extends across multimers, interfaces, and multiple structural models through a single wrapper, run_evo3d(). We demonstrate evo3Ds utility by performing an epitope-level diversity scan of Hepatitis C virus E1/E2 complex, identifying conserved spatial neighbourhoods missed by linear sliding windows, and by evaluating evo3Ds scalability on the octameric Chikungunya virus E1/E2 assembly. By formalising the core components of structure-informed genetic analysis and removing the technical barriers, evo3D streamlines the evaluation of evolutionary patterns directly within 3D structural contexts and we anticipate its wide application in molecular evolution studies. The package is available at github.com/bbroyle/evo3D.

Published in Molecular Biology and Evolution (predicted rank #2) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.