Back

Mass Spectrometric Determination of Site-Specific O-Acetylation in Rhamnogalacturonan-I Oligomers

Fernando, L. D.; Yang, X.; Archer-Hartmann, S.; Heiss, C.; Azadi, P.

2025-12-15 biophysics
10.64898/2025.12.12.694011 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O-Acetylation, a common modification in rhamnogalacturonan I (RG-I), is critical for various biological processes, including plant growth, stress responses, and pathogen defense. Precise determination of the degree and specific positions of acetylation is therefore essential. To date, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and tandem mass spectrometry have been employed to identify acetyl positions in pectin oligosaccharides. Although NMR is effective, it requires pure, high-concentration samples. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS), which uses lower sample amounts, faces challenges due to acetyl migration between monosaccharide positions. The multiple steps in pectin sample analysis can further promote O-acetyl migration, especially near free hydroxyl groups. Moreover, during tandem MS, acetyl groups may detach, complicating accurate tracking. This study presents an approach to lock O-acetyl groups by introducing trideuteroacetyl and propionyl substituents onto free hydroxyls of RG-I or partially acetylated RG-I. By combining matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) MS and electrospray ionization (ESI) MS with MS/MS or tandem mass spectrometry (MSn), we devised a way to determine the monosaccharide sequence in the oligomer and precise positions of acetyl groups in partially acetylated RG-I. This method enables the study of the regiospecificity of recombinant pectin O-acetyltransferases and can be applied to other oligosaccharides to determine acyl positions. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=81 SRC="FIGDIR/small/694011v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (18K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1384347org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c8f21forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@8fed52org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@125c4a1_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.3%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
4
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
6
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
7
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.6%
11
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
12
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
13
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
15
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
16
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
20
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
21
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.5%
23
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%