Back

Comparing the evolvability of an ancestrally reconstructed and modern adenylate kinase

Patterson, M.; Ludewig, H.; Wilson, C.; Woldring, D. R.; Kim, C.; Using, A.; Irvin, J.; Theobald, D. L.; Kern, D.

2025-12-14 biochemistry
10.64898/2025.12.12.693990 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Directed evolution transformed protein engineering by providing a customizable framework for generating enzymes with improved catalytic performance across diverse functions. Yet modern enzymes often stall during directed evolution because populations become trapped on local fitness peaks. Researchers have suggested that ancestral enzymes offer better starting points because they are typically more thermostable. Here we propose and experimentally test an alternative explanation that does not depend on ancestral thermostability. We posit that ancestrally reconstructed sequences are unusually evolvable because they are inferred from the evolutionary lineages that survived to produce extant proteins. Less evolvable ancestors, and the trajectories emanating from them, disappeared by extinction and therefore do not contribute to reconstructed ancestors. Using thermophilic ancestral and modern adenylate kinases, we performed independent single-round selection experiments for activity in vivo and in vitro. In both settings, the ancestral enzyme tolerates a larger number of mutations, yielding more viable variants with greater genetic diversity than its modern descendants. Because mutational robustness promotes evolvability, these results support an intrinsic evolvability of reconstructed ancestral sequences that makes them superior launch points for directed evolution.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.