Engineered AAV Capsids with Enhanced Extracellular Vesicle Loading via Rational Design and Directed Evolution
Vorobieva, I.; Luchner, M.; friedrichsen, H.; Makkar, R.; Chester, S.; Haughton, E.; Conceicao, M.; Steel, H.; Sanders, S. J.; Wood, M.; Gupta, D.
Show abstract
Overcoming immune responses and ensuring efficient delivery remain key obstacles to advancing adeno-associated virus (AAV)-based genetic medicines into the clinic. Encapsulating AAVs within naturally secreted extracellular vesicles (EV-AAV) can shield them from neutralising antibodies and increase transduction efficiency; however, wild-type AAV capsids are incorporated into EVs inefficiently, with the percentage of total AAV genomes in the EV-AAV fraction ranging from 0.5% to 12%, depending on AAV serotype. Here, we establish a high-throughput screening platform that links AAV capsid genotype to EV encapsulation phenotype to improve encapsulation efficiency. We combined rational design with directed evolution to engineer AAV9 variants that preferentially sort into EVs. A library of 392,550 AAV9 capsid mutants was generated by inserting Late (L) domains, established EV-sorting motifs, and fully random amino acid inserts in a surface-exposed region of the AAV9 capsid protein. Screening data were analysed using a statistical model-assisted protein selection (SMAPS) workflow - developed as a novel quantitative modelling and selection strategy for protein engineering challenges of this kind. SMAPS functions as a digital twin of the protein variants in our high-throughput screen, allowing us to monitor uncertainty in copy numbers over multiple steps in the experimental workflow. Using SMAPS, we identified five lead hits, which showed up to threefold increased EV-AAV yield compared to wild-type, without altering particle size. Moreover, in vitro transduction experiments demonstrated that the lead AAV9 capsid exhibits substantially higher transduction efficiency compared to wild-type AAV9 and retained functional activity in the presence of neutralising anti-AAV9 antibodies. Collectively, our study: (i) delivers a scalable high-throughput screen for EV-AAV engineering, (ii) introduces the fields first statistical model-guided quality-control framework for directed evolution, and (iii) provides best-in-class capsids for EV encapsulation.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptomics-informed pharmacology identifies epigenetic and cell cycle regulators as enhancers of AAV production 95%
- Small Alphaherpesvirus Latency-Associated Promoters Drive Efficient And Long-Term Transgene Expression In The Central Nervous System 94%
- Selection of rAAV Vectors that Cross the Human Blood-Brain Barrier 1 and Target the Central Nervous System Using a Transwell Model 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetically encoded SpyTag enables modular AAV retargeting via SpyCatcher-fused ligands for targeted gene delivery. 96%
- Enhanced epigenetic modulation via mRNA-encapsulated lipid nanoparticles enables targeted anti-inflammatory control 94%
- A Toolkit for Rapid Modular Construction of Biological Circuits in Mammalian Cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal trade-off control in machine learning-based library design, with application to adeno-associated virus (AAV) for gene therapy 95%
- Multivariate mining of an alpaca immune repertoire identifies potent cross-neutralising SARS-CoV-2 nanobodies 93%
- In vivo mRNA delivery to virus-specific T cells by light-induced ligand exchange of MHC class I antigen-presenting nanoparticles 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolving Membrane-Associated Accessory Protein Variants for Improved Adeno-Associated Virus Production 98%
- Administration of barcoded AAV capsid library to the putamen of non-human primates identifies variants with efficient retrograde transport 95%
- A truncated reverse transcriptase enhances prime editing by split AAV vectors 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.