Back

Cryo-EM structures of anti Z-DNA antibodies in complex with antigen reveal distinct recognition modes of a left-handed geometry

Chin, D. H. R.; Luo, Y.; Lau, Y. T.; Dutta, N.; He, Z.; Yin, C.; Williams, R. M.; Balachandran, S.; Vicens, Q.; Droge, P.; Luo, D.

2025-12-12 biochemistry
10.64898/2025.12.12.693871 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Double-stranded nucleic acids can undergo transitions from canonical B/A-forms to alternate left-handed Z-DNA/Z-RNA (Z-NAs). Z-NAs are implicated in processes such as neuroinflammation in Alzheimers disease, Lupus Erythematosus, microbial biofilms, and type I interferon-mediated human pathologies. Since endogenous Z-NA sensors like the Z domain can induce B-to-Z transitions, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) Z-D11 and Z22 have been regarded as conformation-specific tools to confirm Z-NA in situ, although high-resolution structural information is missing. Here, we employed single-particle cryo-electron microscopy to solve structures of Z-D11 and Z22 bound to synthetic d(CG)6 12mer Z-DNA duplex. Both mAbs form filamentous trimers around the Z-DNA axis, further stabilized by Fab-Fab interactions. The mAbs achieve specificity through extensive contacts to both Z-form backbone strands and the exposed guanine/cytosine bases in the major groove. This mode of recognition is dictated by shape complementarity rather than sequence specificity, sensing the alternating syn/anti backbone torsions and the phosphate zig-zag geometry unique to Z-DNA. Our data also suggest that these mAbs are not inducing B-to-Z transitions under normal physiological conditions. Finally, comparison to other double-stranded NA-binding mAbs defines a similar structural logic adapted to different helical geometry recognition patterns, thus providing a framework for engineering highly specific nucleic acid probes.

Published in Nucleic Acids Research (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.