Back

Brain size reduction in dogs was already established at least by the Late Neolithic of western Europe, 5,000 years ago

Cucchi, T.; Hays, L.-M.; Veneziano, A.; Michaud, M.; Brassard, C.; Arbogast, R.-M.; Petrequin, P.; Germonpre, M. B.; Cregut-Bonnoure, E.; Elleboudt, F.; Czeibert, K.; Garamszegi, L. Z.; Kubinyi, E.; Kolm, N.; Csorgo, T.; Joseph, J.; Leroy, S.; Guintard, C.; Fusellier, M.; Duchamp, C.; Herrel, A.; Koungoulos, L. G.; Peachey, T. J.; Scarsbrook, L.; Frantz, L.; Madurell-Malapeira, J.; Ladeveze, S.

2025-12-12 zoology
10.64898/2025.12.12.693870 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The timing and causes of brain size reduction in domestic dogs remain uncertain. Using endocasts volume as a proxy for brain size, this study provides a first insight into long-term brain size evolution in the wolf-dog lineage. We compared endocranial volumes of 185 modern and 22 prehistoric wolves and dogs ranging from Western Europe to Australia, and spanning the Pleniglacial (35 Ky BP) to the Late Neolithic (5 Ky BP). Our results reveal that Pleistocene so called "protodogs" show no brain size reduction compared to coeval Pleistocene wolves. Instead, we observed a slightly larger relative endocranial volume in the 35,000-year-old protodog from Goyet, which could suggest increased behavioural flexibility in the presence of humans. This hypothesis needs to be tested further. In contrast, Late Neolithic dogs show a drastic 46% brain size reduction with an endocranial volumes comparable to modern small terrier and toy breeds. The anxious and wary temperaments of these Late Neolithic dogs, induced by the brain tissue reorganization associated with such a size reduction, could have served an alerting purpose, among the many other potential roles dogs could have played within this Late Neolithic socio-ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Biological Anthropology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.5%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 3%
18.8%
50% of probability mass above
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 7%
6.3%
4
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.3%
6
The Anatomical Record
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
7
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
8
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
9
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.9%
11
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Evolutionary Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
15
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
17
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
19
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.9%
21
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
22
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
23
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%