Back

Cell-type Specific Extracellular Vesicles in Mouse Brain: Proteomic Signatures Highlight Astrocytic GlialCAM Network and GPCR Enrichment

Lucart-Sanchez, A. M.; Selles-Climent, E.; Navarro-Calvo, J.; Pont-Espinos, G.; Gomez-Sanchez, J. A.; Estevez, R.; Valor, L. M.; Perez-Gonzalez, R.

2025-12-14 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.12.693760 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) mediate intercellular communication in the central nervous system (CNS) and are emerging as biomarkers of brain health and disease. However, the molecular composition of cell type-specific brain EVs, particularly astrocyte-derived EVs (ADEVs), remains poorly defined. We performed comparative proteomic analysis of neuronal (NDEVs), microglial (MDEVs), and astrocytic (ADEVs) from mouse brain using magnetic immunocapture and LC-MS/MS proteomic profiling. Each EV subtype displayed distinct molecular fingerprints. NDEVs were enriched in synaptic and neurogenesis-related proteins (e.g., APP, SNAP25, GPR158 and BDNF), whereas MDEVs contained immune and phagocytic markers (e.g., TMEM119, CX3CR1, CD11B). Strikingly, the ADEV proteome closely mirrored the recently characterized GlialCAM interactome from leukodystrophy research, encompassing GlialCAM/MLC1 and associated partners involved in ion and water homeostasis (EAAT1/2, AQP4, GJA1), together with GPCRs such as GPRC5B. This overlap suggests that ADEVs encapsulate a molecular scaffold characteristic of astrocytic endfeet, potentially extending their signaling functions to the extracellular space. In conclusion, our study provides a detailed comparative proteomic characterization of brain cell type-specific EVs, revealing that ADEVs contain the GlialCAM/MLC1 network and GPCRs. These findings highlight ADEVs as promising candidates for biomarker development and mechanistic studies of blood-brain barrier integrity and neurodegenerative disorders.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.