Back

One predator and two competing prey: insights from a stochastic metapopulation model and mean-field equations

Suarez, D. L.; Laguna, F.; Guisoni, N.

2025-12-14 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.12.692652 bioRxiv
Show abstract

We investigate a spatially explicit metapopulation model consisting of one predator and two hierarchically competing prey species on a discrete lattice. Each local population follows stochastic rules for extinction, colonisation, competition, and predation. From the master equation of this individual-based model, we rigorously derive the corresponding mean-field equations. The analysis of these first-principles mean-field equations reveals the existence of a rich phase diagram with different coexistence regimes depending on parameter values. We identify both stable and spiral nodes, in agreement with the damped oscillations observed in Monte Carlo simulations in the latter case. We find qualitative agreement between the mean-field results and Monte Carlo simulations for the three-species coexistence and for the coexistence of the two prey species. However, the mean-field description fails to reproduce the coexistence between the predator and the inferior prey at high predator coverages. We argue that this discrepancy arises from spatial prey aggregation, which the mean-field approach cannot capture since it neglects correlations. In the stochastic model, spatial clustering acts as a crucial protective mechanism against predation, particularly for the best coloniser. Our findings suggest that prey aggregation contributes to system stability when colonisation and predation operate at comparable spatial scales. The combination of first-principles mean-field equations and stochastic simulations constitutes a powerful framework for clarifying the roles of hierarchical interactions, predation, colonisation, spatial organisation and stochasticity in multi-species coexistence.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.2%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
Theoretical Ecology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Physical Review Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
11
Physical Review X
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Mathematical Biology
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.7%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
15
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
16
PRX Life
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
17
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
19
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Ecology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%
22
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%