Validation of a Tissue-Based Predictive RNA Test for Immunotherapy Benefit in NSCLC: the PREDAPT study
Flanagan, K. C.; Earls, J.; Hiken, J.; Wellinghoff, R. L.; Ponder, M.; Pemberton, K.; Macdonald, O. K.; Welaya, K.; Pippas, A. W.; D'Silva, K.; Sui, X.; Alexander, W.; Slim, J.; Saccaro, S.; Shenkenberg, T.; Bailey, S. D.; Sonnier, S. A.; Azzi, G.; Bank, B.; Kossman, S. E.; Gonzales, P.; Wade, J. L.; Hellyer, J. A.; McLeod, H. L.; Duncavage, E. J.; Glasscock, J. I.
Show abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have significantly improved outcomes in a subset of patients. OncoPrism, a clinical test employing a multidimensional predictive RNA-based immune biomarker, was evaluated for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study included data from 1,487 patients and evaluated OncoPrism across four NSCLC cohorts: one PD-L1 inhibitor cohort (n=195), one PD-1 inhibitor cohort (n=89), and two non-ICI cohorts (n=193 and n=1,010, respectively). In the PD-L1 inhibitor cohort, OncoPrism predicted progression-free survival (p<0.0001) and overall survival (p=0.043). In the PD-1 inhibitor cohort, an observational clinical trial, PREDAPT (NCT04510129) enrolling patients from 17 healthcare systems, OncoPrism predicted overall response rate (p=0.008), progression-free survival (p=0.004), and overall survival (p=0.011). PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) was not predictive of response, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OncoPrism did not predict overall survival across two non-ICI NSCLC cohorts (p=0.54, p=0.73), suggesting the test is specifically predictive of ICI benefit rather than being prognostic with more limited clinical utility. Overall, the data show OncoPrism high patients are likely to benefit from a two to three-fold increase in overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to those in other OncoPrism groups. These results underscore the impact of OncoPrism to address the current unmet need for ICI response prediction in NSCLC.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 95%
- RRAS and RRAS2 mutations are recurrent oncogenic drivers in lung cancer and are sensitive to the pan-RAS inhibitor RMC-6236 95%
- Circulating tumor DNA analysis in advanced urothelial carcinoma: insights from biological analysis and extended clinical follow-up 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 94%
- A three gene signature predicts response to selinexor in multiple myeloma 93%
- Clinical activity of MAPK targeted therapies in patients with non-V600 BRAF mutant tumors 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer: Findings from the University of California Health System Database 93%
- Added-value of whole exome and RNA Sequencing in advanced and refractory cancer patients with no molecular-based treatment recommendation based on a 90-gene panel 92%
- Combination of hotspot mutations with methylation and fragmentomic profiles to enhance Multi-Cancer Early Detection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of PD-(L)1 blockade monotherapy compared to PD-(L)1 blockade plus chemotherapy in first-line PD-L1-positive advanced lung adenocarcinomas: A cohort study 96%
- Tumor-agnostic transcriptome-based classifier identifies spatial infiltration patterns of CD8+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment and predicts clinical outcome in early- and late-phase clinical trials 94%
- Reversible Downregulation of HLA Class I in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.