Back

Validation of a Tissue-Based Predictive RNA Test for Immunotherapy Benefit in NSCLC: the PREDAPT study

Flanagan, K. C.; Earls, J.; Hiken, J.; Wellinghoff, R. L.; Ponder, M.; Pemberton, K.; Macdonald, O. K.; Welaya, K.; Pippas, A. W.; D'Silva, K.; Sui, X.; Alexander, W.; Slim, J.; Saccaro, S.; Shenkenberg, T.; Bailey, S. D.; Sonnier, S. A.; Azzi, G.; Bank, B.; Kossman, S. E.; Gonzales, P.; Wade, J. L.; Hellyer, J. A.; McLeod, H. L.; Duncavage, E. J.; Glasscock, J. I.

2025-12-15 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.12.25342169
Show abstract

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have significantly improved outcomes in a subset of patients. OncoPrism, a clinical test employing a multidimensional predictive RNA-based immune biomarker, was evaluated for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) benefit in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study included data from 1,487 patients and evaluated OncoPrism across four NSCLC cohorts: one PD-L1 inhibitor cohort (n=195), one PD-1 inhibitor cohort (n=89), and two non-ICI cohorts (n=193 and n=1,010, respectively). In the PD-L1 inhibitor cohort, OncoPrism predicted progression-free survival (p<0.0001) and overall survival (p=0.043). In the PD-1 inhibitor cohort, an observational clinical trial, PREDAPT (NCT04510129) enrolling patients from 17 healthcare systems, OncoPrism predicted overall response rate (p=0.008), progression-free survival (p=0.004), and overall survival (p=0.011). PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) was not predictive of response, progression-free survival, or overall survival. OncoPrism did not predict overall survival across two non-ICI NSCLC cohorts (p=0.54, p=0.73), suggesting the test is specifically predictive of ICI benefit rather than being prognostic with more limited clinical utility. Overall, the data show OncoPrism high patients are likely to benefit from a two to three-fold increase in overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival compared to those in other OncoPrism groups. These results underscore the impact of OncoPrism to address the current unmet need for ICI response prediction in NSCLC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 1.0%
13.3%
2
Clinical Cancer Research
based on 22 papers
Top 0.2%
10.2%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 50%
10.2%
4
npj Precision Oncology
based on 14 papers
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
Cancer Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.7%
4.5%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 17%
4.5%
7
JCO Precision Oncology
based on 11 papers
Top 0.4%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Oncology
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
3.0%
9
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
based on 14 papers
Top 0.8%
2.8%
10
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
based on 14 papers
Top 0.9%
2.8%
11
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 62%
2.5%
13
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
2.3%
14
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 10%
1.8%
15
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 1%
1.6%
16
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 10%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
20
Leukemia
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 47%
1.2%
22
Neuro-Oncology Advances
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 29%
0.8%
24
Blood
based on 14 papers
Top 1.0%
0.8%
25
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
26
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
27
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 6%
0.7%