Back

Hospitalisation and mortality impact of shielding during 2020 in England: a transmission modelling evaluation using the OpenSAFELY platform

Filipe, J. A. N.; Van Leeuwen, E.; Henderson, A.; Davies, N. G.; Jarvis, C.; Curtis, H. J.; Pouwels, K.; Edmunds, W. J.; MacKenna, B.; Bacon, S.; Mehrkar, A.; Goldacre, B.; Tomlinson, L.; Eggo, R. M.

2025-12-17 epidemiology
10.64898/2025.12.12.25342168 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDuring the early phase of the Covid-19 pandemic in England, people with pre-existing conditions that put them at severe clinical risk if infected were advised to drastically reduce face-to-face contacts in a policy known as "shielding". The impact of this policy in preventing COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths has not been evaluated at the national level using transmission-dynamic modelling. MethodsWith the approval of NHS England, we present a retrospective cohort evaluation of the shielding policy, drawing data from electronic health records (EHRs) for 24 million patients in England accessed through the OpenSAFELY platform. The study is from 1 January to 1 December 2020, prior to vaccination and new SARS-CoV-2 variants. We used a dynamic transmission model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission, infection, and hospitalisation, stratified by age and shielding status for the general population (excluding care homes). We estimated transmission rates in the shielding and non-shielding groups using data from the CoMix social contact survey, and fitted the model to hospitalisations and deaths in and outside hospital. FindingsWe found that the risk of hospitalisation was higher for shielding people in all age groups and increased with age. The hospital fatality ratio was similar between shielding and non-shielding people from January to June 2020 and greater in shielding people from July 2020 onward. By comparing the observed epidemic to a counterfactual scenario without shielding, we projected that between 7800 and 10,600 hospitalisations and 2300 to 3500 deaths due to COVID-19 were directly averted by the policy, corresponding to reductions of 25% (24, 28%) and 23% (21, 25%), respectively, in the shielding population in England up to 1 December 2020. Including also the indirect effect in the non-shielding population, we projected between 14,700, and 21,800 hospitalisations and 3700 and 5500 deaths due to COVID-19 were averted by the policy in the total population, each corresponding to reductions of 13% (11, 16%). InterpretationBased on the data and assumptions in this study, the shielding policy reduced pressure on the NHS and severe illness and mortality in clinically-extremely vulnerable shielding patients in England up to 1 December 2020, and, through indirectly-reduced exposure, also in the non-shielding population. Similar policies for other infections could have a comparable public health impact in reducing both mortality and pressure on public health services. FundingMedical Research Foundation, Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health and Care Research, NHS England, The Wellcome Trust.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
9.0%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.7%
4
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.9%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.5%
9
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
10
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
12
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
13
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
15
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
18
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.2%
19
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.7%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.6%