Back

Changes in dengue virus transmission in Mexico: 2016-2023

Simmons, O. S.; Vicco, A.; Martinez-Vega, R.; Ramos-Castaneda, J.; Dorigatti, I.

2025-12-15 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.12.25342126
Show abstract

Mexico has experienced increased dengue incidence in recent years, and there are concerns that the changing climate may enhance dengue transmission in the future. Whilst previous studies have characterised spatial heterogeneities in the long-term average risk of dengue infection in Mexico, the extent to which dengue transmission changes year-to-year has not been investigated. Furthermore, the extent to which dengues four serotypes may differ in their transmissibility remains poorly characterised globally. In this study we characterised the spatial and temporal variations in dengue transmission intensity, as defined by the force of infection, across 27 states in Mexico, by analysing the annual dengue cases reported to surveillance between 2016 and 2023 using established catalytic models and a new, serotype-specific extension of these models that characterises differences in the transmission intensity of the different serotypes. We found evidence of large spatial, temporal, and serotype-specific heterogeneities in transmission intensity across Mexico. Serotype-specific force of infection estimates suggest that DENV-1 and DENV-2 have historically circulated at high levels across Mexico, with DENV-4 transmission intensity low throughout the period studied. Model estimated DENV-3 transmission intensity increased in some states in recent years, coinciding with large outbreaks. This work quantifies serotype-specific differences in dengue transmission intensity using routinely collected case-notification data and demonstrates how extensive RT-PCR-testing and new rapid diagnostic tests capable of discerning infecting serotypes can help to better understand the contributions of different serotypes to transmission.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
based on 166 papers
Top 1%
21.6%
2
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 4%
13.8%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 54%
8.3%
4
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 50 papers
Top 1%
5.8%
5
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 48%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
7
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 12%
2.7%
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
based on 100 papers
Top 6%
1.9%
9
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 16%
1.7%
10
Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 13%
1.7%
12
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 16%
1.5%
13
Malaria Journal
based on 23 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 20%
1.3%
15
BMJ Global Health
based on 95 papers
Top 11%
0.9%
16
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 10%
0.9%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 9%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Global Health
based on 24 papers
Top 3%
0.9%
19
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Nature Medicine
based on 88 papers
Top 17%
0.7%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 12%
0.7%
24
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 11%
0.7%