Chromosome-Scale Genome Assembly of Australian Finger Lime and Resequencing Reveal the Hidden Diversity of Oceanian Citrus
Hufnagel, B.; Alves, M.; Piet, Q.; Dereeper, A.; Giraud, D.; Calvez, L.; Belser, C.; Labadie, K.; Duprat, S.; Cruaud, C.; Istace, B.; Curk, F.; Menezes, F. D. S.; Diop, K.; Miranda, M.; Froelicher, Y.; Smith, M.; Aleza, P.; Lebegin, S.; Martin, C.; Micheli, F.; Mournet, P.; Droc, G.; Pena, L.; Wulff, N.; Morillon, R.; Wincker, P.; Aury, J.-M.; Lemainque, A.; Ollitrault, P.
Show abstract
Oceanian citrus species, including wild taxa native to Australia and Papua New Guinea, form a genetically distinct clade within the Citrus L. (1753) genus. These species remain largely underexplored, despite their adaptation to diverse environments and relevance for citrus improvement. To support their use in breeding and evolutionary studies, we generated a high-quality, Chromosome-scale genome assembly of an Australian finger lime accession (SRA 1002), a natural interspecific hybrid. The genome was assembled using long-read sequencing, optical mapping, and a high-density genetic map, resulting in nine pseudomolecules covering over 97% of the genome. Using this reference, we analyzed whole-genome resequencing data from 132 accessions representing the diversity of Asian and Oceanian citrus. Variant calling across the dataset produced a high-resolution catalogue of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and derived database of SNP fully discriminant of 20 Citrus species (DSNPs), enabling detailed exploration of inter- and intra-specific diversity. The data reveal a strong population structure within the group with clear heterozygosity variation between ancestral species and admixed accessions, reflecting their complex evolutionary history and hybridization patterns. This study provides the first integrated genomic framework for Oceanian citrus diversity, offering essential tools for downstream applications in citrus breeding, conservation, and evolutionary genomics. The resources generated lay the groundwork for future association studies and the targeted introgression of beneficial traits into cultivated citrus.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A haplotype-complete chromosome-level assembly of octoploid Urochloa humidicola cv. Tully reveals multiple genomic compositions and evolutionary histories in the species 97%
- Conserving a threatened North American walnut: a chromosome-scale reference genome for butternut (Juglans cinerea) 96%
- Insights into the domestication of avocado and potential genetic contributors to heterodichogamy 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unlocking Genetic Diversity in Colombian Cassava Landraces for Accelerated Breeding 96%
- Patterns of presence-absence variation of NLRs across populations of Solanum chilense are clade-dependent and mainly shaped by past demographic history. 96%
- Impact of parasitic lifestyle and different types of centromere organization on chromosome and genome evolution in the plant genus Cuscuta 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A super-pangenome for cultivated citrus reveals evolutive features during the allopatric phase of their reticulate evolution 97%
- A Citrullus genus super-pangenome reveals extensive variations in wild and cultivated watermelons and sheds light on watermelon evolution and domestication 97%
- Chromosome-level Thlaspi arvense genome provides new tools for translational research and for a newly domesticated cash cover crop of the cooler climates 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome and transcriptome architecture of allopolyploid okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) 96%
- Satellite DNA landscapes after allotetraploidisation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) reveal unique A and B subgenomes 96%
- A gap-free tomato genome built from complementary PacBio and Nanopore long DNA sequences reveals extensive linkage drag during breeding 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.