Back

MisTIC: Missegmented Transcript Inference Correction for Improved Spatial Transcriptomics Analysis

Yang, Y.; DePasquale, E. A.; Adeleke, D.; Xie, X.; Lu, Z.; Nelson, M. D.; Xiao, G.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.

2025-12-15 bioinformatics
10.64898/2025.12.11.693759 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Imaging-based spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) technologies, such as 10X Xenium, MERSCOPE, and CosMx, have revolutionized our ability to study gene expression within the spatial context of tissues at single-cell resolution. The acquisition of such data relies heavily on cell segmentation algorithms, which often produce imperfect boundaries, leading to transcript misassignment. These misassignments can significantly affect downstream analyses, including cell type identification, differential expression analysis, cell-cell communication, and RNA localization. We present MisTIC (Missegmented Transcript Inference Correction), a variational Bayesian model designed to correct transcript misassignment errors without requiring resegmentation. In benchmarking analyses using synthetic data with simulated transcript misassignment, MisTIC demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in removing misassigned transcripts. In real data applications, MisTIC effectively enhances cell type identification, reduces ambiguity in differential expression analysis, and improves the detection of cell-cell communication. Furthermore, RNA localization analysis based on data corrected by MisTIC revealed that, in T cells located near cancer-associated fibroblasts compared to those farther away, genes involved in T cell activation, inflammation, and cytotoxicity were depleted from cytoplasmic regions despite not being differentially expressed between the two T cell subsets. In conclusion, MisTIC is a powerful tool for correcting transcript misassignment in SRT data. It not only improves the accuracy of routine analyses but also enables novel investigations that provide deeper insights into the dynamics of gene expression.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.