An algorithm underlying directional hearing in fish
Veith, J.; Svanidze, A.; Judkewitz, B.
Show abstract
Humans and other land vertebrates localize sound by comparing the signals in each ear. Even though these differences are virtually absent underwater, fish are still able to sense the direction of sound. In 1975, Arie Schuijf proposed that this ability could arise from a comparison of the particle motion phase and the pressure phase of sound, a prediction which was recently confirmed experimentally for near-field sounds. In natural environments, however, sounds arrive from variable distances, altering the motion-pressure phase relationship. Thus, directional hearing and distance hearing are potentially at conflict. There is currently neither a model nor experimental data for how fish deal with this complexity. Here, we systematically introduce phase differences to the particle motion and pressure components of sound pulses to quantify the directional tuning of startle responses in Danionella cerebrum. We find that the fishs directed startle behavior is both frequency and phase dependent, and introduce a new model that quantitatively predicts the sensorimotor transformation across all observed stimuli. This framework likely extends to other otophysan fishes with evolutionarily conserved hearing apparatus, representing [~]15% of all vertebrate species. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/693757v3_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (58K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cff8b5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d174a1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1400e0aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@59cfe3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Probabilistic Models of Larval Zebrafish Behavior: Structure on Many Scales 95%
- Deconstructing hunting behavior reveals a tightly coupled stimulus-response loop 95%
- Non-preferred contrast responses in the Drosophila motion pathways reveal a receptive field structure that explains a common visual illusion 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.