Back

Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination: a global analysis of cost-effectiveness and optimal safety stock

Shaweno, D.; Mafirakureva, N.; Lee, A.; Wong, T. S.; Dodd, P. J.

2025-12-15 health economics
10.64898/2025.12.11.25342124 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundBacille Calmette-Guerin (BCG) is the most commonly-used vaccination globally, but multi-country cost-effectiveness analyses are outdated and have not considered sequelae in tuberculosis survivors. A rationale is lacking to guide the size of safety stocks. MethodsFor the 110 countries using universal neonatal BCG vaccination, we used a decision tree model to compare the costs and health benefits of status-quo BCG vaccination for children aged 0-4 years in 2023 to a counterfactual where no BCG was used, accounting for post-tuberculosis sequelae. We assessed cost-effectiveness against a threshold of 30% per capita gross domestic product from a health system perspective. We determined the safety stock that maximized expected net benefit. FindingsBCG vaccination prevented 742,000 (95% uncertainty interval[UI]: 541,000 to 991,000) tuberculosis episodes and 192,000 (95%UI:138,000 to 264,000) tuberculosis deaths globally. Of these, 49,000 (95%UI: 32,300 to 72,100) episodes and 30,000 (95%UI: 19,600 to 45,100) deaths prevented were from tuberculous meningitis. Universal neonatal BCG vaccination was cost-effective in the majority (75/110) of countries where it is used and in all countries with estimated tuberculosis incidence over 42 per 100,000 per year, with a median incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $276 (interquartile range: $84 to $1514) per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Median optimal safety stock for a 10% uncertainty in demand was 11% (IQR: 7% to 17%) of expected demand. InterpretationBCG vaccination continues to prevent substantial morbidity and mortality in children globally, and cost-effectiveness considerations support continued universal vaccination in most countries with this policy currently. FundingUK EPSRC & DHSC

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.