Back

Targeting 5-Ht7 Receptor With Biased Ligands To Alleviate Pain And Spinal Neuroinflammation

Madouri, F.; Guimpied, C.; Pigeon, E.; Hervouet-Coste, N.; Gosset, D.; Auzou, P.; Kremer, M.; Leboulleux, Q.; Hiebel, M.-A.; Le Bescont, J.; Guillaumet, G.; Suzenet, F.; Baril, P.; Serreau, R.; Morisset-Lopez, S.

2025-12-13 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.10.693444 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The serotonin 5-HT7 receptor (5-HT7R), a member of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) and represents a promising target for treating CNS disorders such as sleep disturbances, migraine, neuropsychiatric conditions, and neuropathic pain. Owing to its therapeutic potential, extensive efforts have focused on developing selective 5-HT7R ligands. In the last decades, biased signalling has emerged as a key concept in GPCR pharmacology as biased ligands can stabilize specific active states of the receptor and trigger selective activation of downstream signaling pathways. In this context, we recently identified two biased 5-HT7R ligands, Serodolin and MOA51, from different chemical series. Here, we aimed to compare the pharmacological and safety profiles of these ligands and to assess their effect on pain-related behaviors and spinal neuroinflammation. In inflammatory pain models (acid acetic writhing, formalin and CFA tests), both serodolin and MOA51 effectively attenuated pain responses to a similar extend. Furthermore, in neuropathic pain models, spinal nerve injury (SNI) and Cuff model, both ligands reversed mechanical allodynia. Interestingly, unlike pregabalin, a clinically used reference drug, neither Serodolin nor MOA51 induced apparent tolerance after 10 consecutive days of administration. Treatment with these 5-HT7R ligands also reduced spinal microglial and attenuated neuronal hyperactivity in the spinal cord. Altogether these findings highlight the potential of 5-HT7R-biased ligands as promising analgesic candidates capable of modulating neuroinflammatory processes and mitigating both inflammatory and neuropathic pain.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Pain
70 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
2
Pharmacological Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
The Journal of Pain
26 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.4%
6
Neurotherapeutics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 25%
3.6%
8
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
British Journal of Pharmacology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
11
Theranostics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
12
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
15
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.8%
16
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 13%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Headache and Pain
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
21
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
22
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
23
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
25
Brain
154 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
27
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
29
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Progress in Neurobiology
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%