Boosting the signal: Expectation-driven gain modulation of preparatory spatial attention
van Moorselaar, D.; Stigchel, S. v. d.
Show abstract
The visual system can flexibly adjust attentional deployment to match task demands, but whether observers can proactively modulate the spatial scope of attention based on expectations about upcoming search difficulty remains unclear. According to the zoom lens model, attention can narrow or broaden its spatial extent, with narrower focus enhancing processing efficiency, a mechanism that would benefit target discrimination in crowded displays. We tested whether observers adjust attentional scope when expecting sparse versus dense search arrays by combining spatial cueing with block-wise manipulations of display density expectations. Participants performed a visual search task in which endogenous cues predicted target location, while blocks predominantly contained either sparse (1 target, 3 distractors) or dense (1 target, 7 distractors) displays. We applied inverted encoding models to EEG data to reconstruct spatial channel tuning functions, enabling precise characterization of both the locus and breadth of attentional deployment. Behaviorally, expecting difficult searches selectively improved accuracy at cued locations without costs elsewhere. Consistent with this selective benefit, neural measurements revealed that expectancy enhanced the amplitude of spatially selective responses at the attended location but did not alter tuning width. These findings demonstrate that expectations about search difficulty modulate attention through gain-based signal enhancement rather than adjustments to spatial scope, revealing that preparatory attentional control operates via amplitude modulation within a stable spatial focus. This mechanism complements reactive attentional adjustments and provides an efficient means for the visual system to optimize processing under predictable task demands.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial predictive context speeds up visual search by biasing local attentional competition 98%
- Variable processing shifts during perceptual acceleration: Evidence from temporal integration 97%
- Differential and overlapping effects between exogenous and endogenous attention shape perceptual facilitation during visual processing 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Independent spatiotemporal effects of spatial attention and background clutter on human object location representations 97%
- Neural mechanisms of attention, not expectation, govern spatial selection by probabilistic cueing 97%
- Top-down specific preparatory activations for Selective Attention and Perceptual Expectations 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neural representations of covert attention across saccades: comparing pattern similarity to shifting and holding attention during fixation 96%
- Alpha-band lateralization and microsaccades elicited by exogenous cues do not track attentional orienting 96%
- Prestimulus alpha phase modulates visual temporal integration 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.