Back

EpiTox: A Multi-Modular Framework for Population-Aware Off-Target Prediction Highlighting MAGE-A3 Cross-Reactivity

Al-Hasani, H.; Ali, M.; Kraemer, S. D.; Heiss, K.; Sinclair, A.; Herz, T.; Meyer, P.; Hamde, P.; Roth, G.; Birkenfeld, J.; Selinger, O.; Schuster, S.

2025-12-12 bioinformatics
10.64898/2025.12.10.693357 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Targeting intracellular tumor antigens presented by peptide human leukocyte antigen (pHLA) complexes offers a promising immunotherapeutic strategy for patients with limited treatment options. However, development of pHLA-targeted drugs such as T-cell receptor (TCR) mimic antibodies (TCRm) and TCR-based therapeutics remains challenging due to severe offtumor and off-target toxicities arising from incomplete pHLA off-target profiling. The fatal neurological toxicities observed in the MAGEA3 TCR-T cell trial, potentially linked to unanticipated cross-reactivity with EPS8L2- and MAGEA12-derived peptides, underscore the urgent need for more comprehensive safety assessment. While current preclinical de-risking methods utilize sequence similarity searches, they lack the layered integration of genetic context, HLA binding profiles, and structured risk assessment needed to comprehensively evaluate peptide cross-reactivity. To address these limitations, we developed EpiTox, a computational multi-modular platform that systematically identifies and evaluates pHLA off-targets. EpiTox integrates proteome-wide sequence similarity, genetic context, HLA binding profiles, and layered risk assessment to provide a holistic evaluation of potential cross-reactive peptides. Using MAGEA3 as a model, EpiTox identified known toxic off-targets and predicted novel epitopes. Notably, an anti-MAGEA3 therapeutic TCRm antibody bound several newly predicted off-targets, including three SNP-derived peptides. By enabling comprehensive and predictive preclinical safety screening, Epi-Tox supports safer TCRm drug development and may help prevent future clinical failures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.