Unlocking karst biodiversity with eDNA: a validated qPCR toolkit for discovery and monitoring the worlds largest cavefish radiation (Cyprinidae: Sinocyclocheilus)
Peng, Y.; Yu, S.; Chen, R.; Liu, Y.; Mao, T.; Lin, T.; Sun, D.; Pie, M. R.; Yang, J.; Meegaskumbura, M.
Show abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) enables non-invasive detection of aquatic species through trace genetic material, but uncertainties regarding DNA persistence, detection accuracy, and the limited taxonomic resolution of stygian fauna have constrained its use in subterranean aquatic environments. The species-rich cavefish genus Sinocyclocheilus, endemic to the karst landscapes of southwestern China, offers an excellent model for understanding these issues. With over eighty species, many of which are endemics, and many still being described, this lineage is taxonomically rich, poorly understood, and highly threatened. However, access to these deep habitats remains challenging, making eDNA detection one of the most practical methods for documenting and monitoring them. We developed and validated a qPCR assay targeting a hypervariable region of the mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene, allowing for genus-specific detection and species-level identification. Laboratory and field evaluations involving 47 representative species confirmed high specificity and a detection limit of around 20 DNA copies per reaction (R{superscript 2} = 0.995). Controlled degradation studies indicated that temperature and pH strongly affect DNA persistence. Field surveys across 47 karst sites (37 caves and 10 surface sites) detected Sinocyclocheilus eDNA in only 33 caves. Dideoxy sequencing of qPCR amplicons provided species-level identification and phylogenetic validation, including detection of a new species. At three cave sites yielding multiple qPCR detections, 16S metabarcoding enabled species discrimination. By integrating qPCR assay validation, eDNA degradation modelling, hierarchical genetic identification via dideoxy sequencing, and selective NGS metabarcoding, this study presents a strategic framework for applying eDNA methods in subterranean environments.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring 97%
- Molecular diet analysis in zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp.) and an assessment of the utility of aquatic filter feeders as biological eDNA filters 97%
- Estimation of Species Abundance Based on the Number of Segregating Sites using Environmental DNA (eDNA) 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Water volume, biological and PCR replicates influence the characterization of deep-sea pelagic fish communities. 97%
- Significant improvement of environmental DNA assay by targeting retrotransposon sequences characteristic to Anguilla eels 97%
- Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations for metabarcoding-based port biological baseline surveys aimed at marine non-indigenous species monitoring and risk-assessments 96%
- Integrating environmental DNA monitoring to inform eel (Anguilla anguilla) status in freshwaters at their easternmost range - A case study in Cyprus 96%
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the dynamics of the aquatic community in Oslofjord through time series analysis of eDNA 97%
- A non-invasive eDNA tool for detecting sea lamprey larvae in river sediments: analytical validation and field testing in a low abundance ecosystem 97%
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding provides enhanced detection of the European eel Anguilla anguilla and fish community structure in pumped river catchments 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.