Back

Interplay between petal identity and cell layer identity in petunia flowers

Cavallini-Speisser, Q.; Desert, E.; Duvernois-Berthet, E.; Chambrier, P.; Morel, P.; Letcher, B.; Rey, C.; Just, J.; Rodrigues Bento, S.; Bouyer, D.; Monniaux, M.

2025-12-12 developmental biology
10.64898/2025.12.10.691030 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In flowering plants, floral organ identity is specified by the combinatorial action of homeotic genes. While the role of these genes in the early specification of organ identity is well established, their late function throughout floral organ development and in specific cell types is much less characterized. In particular, since plant organs are structured in clonally-independent cell layers, whether and how homeotic identity interacts with cell layer identity is unknown. We have previously identified cell layer-specific mutants for the petal identity gene PhDEF in petunia flowers, resulting in drastically different petal phenotypes whether PhDEF is expressed in the petal epidermis or in the mesophyll. In this study, using a combination of single-cell RNA-Seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation on phdef cell layer-specific mutants, we find that PhDEF regulates a different set of target genes in the petal epidermis and mesophyll, with a major regulatory action in the epidermis. We uncover a high diversity of binding profiles in PhDEF target genes, with a complex combination of layer-specific or -aspecific binding sites, and a much more prominent binding of PhDEF in the epidermis than in the mesophyll. Our study highlights that floral homeotic genes like PhDEF can have different regulatory actions in different cell contexts, here different cell layers, and that cell layer identity indeed influences the regulatory processes underlying homeotic identity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.