Telehealth consultation in medical education: a mixed methods study of medical students' and educators' experiences
Wetzlmair, L.-C.; O'Malley, A.; O'Carroll, V.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth in healthcare delivery and education. However, the integration of telehealth into medical curricula is often limited to institutional initiatives and remains scattered. This raises questions about the experienced barriers and enablers for education in telehealth consultation. ObjectiveThis study sought to explore medical students and educators experiences with telehealth consultations in academic and clinical learning environments during the pandemic in the United Kingdom. MethodsA cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data was gathered via online questionnaires, while qualitative insights were derived from semi-structured interviews. A total of 248 participants (153 students, 87 educators) responded to the survey, of those, 23 participants (13 students, 10 educators) were interviewed. ResultsTelehealth consultations were primarily taught and delivered during clinical placements. The pandemic and subsequent educational adjustments were identified as enabling factors. Exposure to telehealth increased students confidence and readiness, particularly through active participation in consultations. Barriers included inadequate technical infrastructure, lack of confidential spaces, and limited confidence of educators teaching telehealth consultation. ConclusionThe findings highlight the need for an integrated telehealth curriculum that incorporates practical exposure and addresses technical limitations in both universities as well as healthcare settings.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 97%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 96%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 94%
- Participant perceptions of disability training for health workers: a qualitative study in Ghana 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 95%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 96%
- Is virtual care the new normal? Evidence supporting Covid-19’s durable transformation on healthcare delivery 93%
- A Web-based, Mobile Responsive Application to Screen Healthcare Workers for COVID Symptoms: Descriptive Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 97%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.