Back

Type 1 Dolichocolon as a Potential Anatomic Co-Morbidity in Pediatric Perianal Crohn Disease

Kellermayer, R.; Szigeti, R.; Sammer, M.; Vogel, A. M.; Winter, H.

2025-12-15 gastroenterology
10.64898/2025.12.10.25341790 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPerianal Crohns disease (PCD) represents one of the most severe and refractory forms of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Constipation and colonic redundancy, particularly type 1 dolichocolon (T1-DC), may increase distal rectosigmoid pressure, and exacerbate perianal pathology. We hypothesized that T1-DC is more common in children with PCD than in those with uncomplicated ileocolonic Crohns disease (CD) or non-IBD controls. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 20 consecutive pediatric PCD cases (penetrating [B3p] or inflammatory [B1p]) and compared them with 20 patients with non-complicated ileocolonic CD (L3/B1) and 30 non-IBD trauma controls. DC type was determined radiographically using established criteria, focusing on T1- and T2-DC. Constipation history was abstracted from medical records under IRB-approved protocols. ResultsDC was significantly more prevalent in PCD than in ileocolonic CD or controls (p < 0.001), primarily due to T1-DC. The associations persisted (p<0.03) in PCD patients without a history of constipation. ConclusionsRectosigmoid redundancy (T1-DC) may represent an underrecognized anatomic co-morbidity in pediatric PCD, contributing to increased distal pressure and susceptibility to perianal complications. Identification of T1-DC could inform surgical decision-making and postoperative management. Targeted approaches--such as segmental resection during stoma reversal, structured bowel regimens, physical activity, and pelvic-floor biofeedback--may help reduce recurrence risk. Prospective studies are needed to define the mechanistic role of colonic redundancy in the pathogenesis of PCD.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.