Back

O-GlcNAcylation and an importin-β radial gradient keep the FG barrier liquid in live-cell nuclear pores

Yu, M.; Heidari, M.; Palacio-Rodriguez, K.; Ruan, H.; Mingu, S.; Hidayat, A. A.; Bode, M.; Sikora, M.; Hummer, G.; Lemke, E. A.

2025-12-11 biophysics
10.64898/2025.12.09.693204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Summary ParagraphThe nuclear pore complex (NPC) regulates the molecular traffic between nucleus and cytoplasm.1,2 Its permeability barrier is formed by intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) known as FG-nucleoporins (FG-NUPs), whose physical state has long been debated.3-13 Deciphering how FG-NUPs behave inside living cells is crucial for understanding how the NPC achieves selective and rapid transport. Here, by combining site-specific labelling with picosecond time-resolved fluorescence anisotropy, we reveal that FG domains exhibit nanosecond-scale, liquid-like mobility in live cells, yet undergo a liquid-to-solid transition in vitro. Experiments and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations further show that importin-{beta}, a major nuclear transport receptor, and O-linked {beta}-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNAc), a key post-translational modification of FG-NUPs together stabilise the dynamic FG network. Finely balanced FG-FG interactions modulated by O-GlcNAcylation, along with FG-importin-{beta} interactions, maintain liquidity and enrich importin-{beta} near the NPC periphery, while extended FG domains remain in the central channel to form the transport barrier. These findings reconcile conflicting models of FG-NUP organisation4,6,8,10,14,15 and explain the recent observations in high-resolution MINFLUX studies of importin-{beta} depletion from the pore centre in mammalian cells.16 Beyond resolving debates over FG-NUP behaviour, our study underscores the importance of studying IDPs in their cellular context, with broader implications for understanding IDP-related diseases, including viral infections, cancer, and neurodegenerative disorders.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.