Structural Mechanisms Underlying Distinct Binding and Activities of 18:0 and 18:1 Lysophosphatidic acids at LPA1 Receptor
Diyaolu, A.; Obi, P.; Balijepalli, P.; Meier, K. E.; Natesan, S.
Show abstract
Lysophosphatidic acids (LPAs) are bioactive lipids that regulate numerous physiological functions in humans. Cell signaling by LPAs is mediated mainly via six LPA receptors (LPA1-6), class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Among these, LPA1 is recognized to play an essential role in cell proliferation, survival, migration, and tumorigenesis. Despite the structural similarity, 18:0-LPA and 18:1-LPA exhibit distinct functional responses in cell lines overexpressing LPA1. Specifically, our in vitro studies show that 18:1-LPA induces greater Erk activation than 18:0-LPA in PC-3 human prostate cancer cells. The structural basis underlying this differential receptor activation has not been previously studied. Using classical molecular dynamics and enhanced sampling techniques, we examined the access and binding mechanisms of the two LPA species to the active state LPA1 receptor. The results show that 18:0-LPA and 18:1-LPA adopt distinct and dynamic poses in the orthosteric pocket despite their similar starting configurations. Mainly, the alkyl tails of the ligands exhibit distinct orientations and residue interactions, leading to differential conformational changes in key activation switches on the conserved CWxP and PIF structural motifs of the receptor. Also, there are significant differences in interhelical interactions at the intracellular end of the transmembrane helices 1, 3, 6, and 7. These distinct arrangements lead to striking differences in LPA1 interactions with the G-helix of the heterotrimeric Gi-protein. Notably, 18:0-LPA and 18:1-LPA exhibit similar membrane partitioning characteristics and receptor entry processes through aqueous paths. Our comprehensive in-silico studies offer valuable structural insights into the observed differences in functional responses by 18:0-and 18:1-LPA.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- An Allosteric Cholesterol Site in Glycine Receptors Characterized Through Molecular Simulations 97%
- Coevolution-driven method for efficiently simulating conformational changes in proteins reveals molecular details of ligand effects in the beta2AR receptor 96%
- An interaction between the transmembrane domains of Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A and its endogenous substrate M protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulations 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- G Protein-Coupled Receptor-Ligand Dissociation Rates and Mechanisms from {tau}RAMD Simulations 96%
- Development of OPLS-AA/M Parameters for Simulations of G Protein-Coupled Receptors and Other Membrane Proteins 96%
- Bayesian nonparametric analysis of residence times for protein-lipid interactions in Molecular Dynamics simulations 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hidden GPCR structural transitions addressed by multiple walker supervised molecular dynamics (mwSuMD) 96%
- Revealing druggable cryptic pockets in the Nsp-1 of SARS-CoV-2 and other β-coronaviruses by simulations and crystallography 95%
- Evolutionary Divergence in the Conformational Landscapes of Tyrosine vs Serine/Threonine Kinases 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Coupling the role of lipids to the conformational dynamics of the ABC transporter P-gp 96%
- Effect of Histidine Covalent Modification on Strigolactone Receptor Activation and Selectivity 96%
- Simulations support the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.