Altered Brain Network Topology during Successful Response Inhibition in Children with Binge Eating
Martin, E.; Schulz, K. P.; Hildebrandt, T.; Sysko, R.; Berner, L. A.; Li, X.
Show abstract
AimAlthough a risk factor for the later development of eating disorders, few studies examine the neural underpinnings of binge eating (BE) in children. Preliminary evidence suggests a role of the corticostriatal system; the purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of the inhibitory control brain network for risk of BE in children. MethodsData from 65 children with BE (57% girls) and 84 matched controls (52% girls) from the 4.0 baseline release of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study were included. Stop Signal Task-based fMRI data were analyzed using graph theoretic techniques. Global and nodal network properties (e.g. efficiency, betweenness-centrality) were compared for between-group differences and sex-by-group interactions. ResultsDespite comparable behavioral performance, children with BE showed significantly increased nodal efficiency of the right postcentral gyrus and left middle frontal gyrus (MFG), and increased connectedness of the right postcentral gyrus compared to control children. Children with BE showed distinct network hubs including the right MFG and left insula, while controls had distinct hubs in the right orbitofrontal and left fusiform gyri. Group-specific sex differences were found in the functioning of insular and frontal cortices. ConclusionIncreased efficiency and connectedness in frontal and parietal nodes of the inhibitory control network functioning in children with BE may represent a vulnerability for overeating. Distinct sex differences in functioning in children with BE compared to control children may reflect specific vulnerabilities to BE in the inhibitory control system in boys and girls that may contribute to sex differences in prevalence.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clarifying the role of Cortico-Cortical and Amygdalo-Cortical brain dysconnectivity associated with Conduct Problems 96%
- Brain Anatomical Covariation Patterns Linked to Binge Drinking and Age at First Full Drink Prior to 21 Years 95%
- Emotion regulation in emerging adults with major depressive disorder and frequent cannabis use 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurodevelopmental Subtypes of Functional Brain Organization in the ABCD Study Using a Rigorous Analytic Framework 94%
- The Relationships of Resting-state Brain Entropy (BEN), Ovarian Hormones and Behavioral Inhibition and Activation Systems (BIS/BAS) 94%
- Development of the Brain Functional Connectome Follows Puberty-Dependent Nonlinear Trajectories 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- No support for white matter microstructural properties and connectivity differences in the combined and inattentive adhd presentations. 95%
- Emotional responsiveness task in emotional distress: correlated of functional neuroimaging in anorexia and bulimia 94%
- Associations Between Resting State Functional Brain Connectivity and Childhood Anhedonia: A Reproduction and Replication Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Limbic System White Matter in Children and Adolescents with ADHD: A Longitudinal Diffusion MRI Analysis 96%
- Decoding the neural basis of sensory phenotypes in Autism 96%
- Large-scale exploration of whole-brain structural connectivity in anorexia nervosa: alterations in the connectivity of frontal and subcortical networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing Functional Network Connectivity of the Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Mediates Externalizing Psychopathology in Adolescents with Child Neglect 96%
- Identifying Developmental Changes in Functional Brain Connectivity Associated with Cognitive Functioning in Children and Adolescents with ADHD 94%
- Puberty contributes to adolescent development of fronto-striatal functional connectivity supporting inhibitory control 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.