Back

NEMAT: An Automated Non-Equilibrium Free-Energy Framework for Predicting Ligand Affinity in Membrane Proteins

Ortega-Bartolome, A.; Crehuet, R.

2025-12-11 biophysics
10.64898/2025.12.09.692605 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantifying the strength of small-molecule binding to proteins is essential for understanding biological function and for advancing drug discovery. Computational free-energy methods aim to predict these interactions accurately, yet membrane proteins remain particularly difficult due to the added thermo-dynamic effects of the lipid bilayer. Alchemical free-energy calculations provide state-of-the-art accuracy by transforming one ligand into another, and recent non-equilibrium approaches (NEQ-FEP) offer improved efficiency and parallelization. However, no existing workflow automates NEQ-FEP for membrane proteins and enables decomposition of the observed binding free energy into membrane-partitioning and protein-specific components. NEMAT is an open-source pipeline that performs automated non-equilibrium alchemical transformations in water, membranes, and membrane-embedded protein environments. Here we show that NEMAT reproduces experimental binding-energy trends for P2Y1 ligands with accuracy comparable to established equilibrium methods. These findings demonstrate that NEQ-FEP can be applied reliably to membrane systems when supported by a consistent workflow. In contrast to previous approaches, NEMAT provides systematic control over transition length, sampling, and replica averaging, enabling stable work-distribution overlap and reproducible free-energy estimates. In a broader context, NEMAT offers a practical route to mechanistically interpretable affinity predictions for membrane-embedded targets. Its ability to dissect membrane and protein contributions advances our understanding of lig- and selectivity at lipid-facing pockets and supports the routine application of non-equilibrium free-energy methods in drug discovery.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.