Back

App usability, engagement, and postpartum weight retention: secondary analysis of the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial

Duizer, L.; Geusens, F.; Geerits, E.; Devlieger, R.; Bogaerts, A.

2025-12-11 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2025.12.09.25341940 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPostpartum weight retention (PPWR) is a key contributor to long-term obesity risk and an important determinant of maternal health. Mobile health (mHealth) interventions may support postpartum change to a healthier lifestyle, but their effectiveness may depends on usability. This study examined whether perceived usability of the INTER-ACT app was associated with weight loss at 6 months postpartum and whether this association was mediated by app use frequency, motivational power, and implementation of lifestyle recommendations. MethodsThis secondary analysis used data from the intervention arm of the INTER-ACT randomized controlled trial (RCT), which provided postpartum lifestyle coaching and a supportive app to women with excessive gestational weight gain (EGWG). Participants (n=138) completed the process evaluation survey at 6 months postpartum, which included the System Usability Scale (SUS), perceived motivational power, and perceived implementation of lifestyle recommendations. Weight loss was calculated between 6 weeks and 6 months postpartum. Pearson correlations and parallel mediation analyses tested associations between usability, engagement-related variables, and weight loss, adjusting for maternal age, parity, and pre-pregnancy BMI. ResultsThe INTER-ACT app demonstrated moderate usability (mean SUS=60.6). Usability was positively associated with app use frequency (B=.05, p<.001), perceived motivational power (B=.003, p<.001), and perceived implementation of lifestyle recommendations (B=.01, p=.036). However, none of these were associated with weight loss at 6 months postpartum. Usability showed no total, direct, or indirect effect on weight loss. Gestational weight gain (GWG) was the only significant predictor (B=0.24, p=0.003). Higher usability was also associated with more positive and fewer negative emotional responses (p<.05). ConclusionApp usability was associated with engagement and positive emotional experience, but did not translate into reduced PPWR. GWG remained the main determinant of postpartum weight outcomes. Future interventions should prioritize preventing EGWG and complement this with emotionally supportive postpartum mHealth tools as part of a multi-faceted strategy.

Published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Digital Health · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
15.1%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
International Journal of Obesity
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
6
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
7
Obesity
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
8
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
10
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
13
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
18
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Preventive Medicine Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%