How many infection control staff is needed in acute care hospitals? A Delphi approach.
Mulder, M.; Sarink, M.; Stoffer, G.; Mes, M.; van Oorschot, E.; van Dommelen, L.; Voss, A.; Severin, J.; Veldkamp, K.-E.; van Mansfeld, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe Dutch recommendation on infection prevention and control (IPC) staffing in acute care hospitals from 2007 is outdated due to evolving hospital care, including shorter admissions, more complex and day-care procedures, more vulnerable patients, increasing antimicrobial resistance, and enhanced regulatory demands. Therefore, an updated staffing norm for IPC is needed. MethodsMinimum weekly hours required for IPC activities was determined by Delphi method across three model hospitals: academic, large non-academic, and small non-academic. Four questionnaire rounds were conducted among IPC practitioners (IPCP) and clinical microbiologists (CM). Staffing needs per role and hospital type were calculated. After three rounds a core expert team focus group formulated a new full time equivalent (FTE) norm which was proposed in the final round. ResultsFor academic hospitals, 100% consensus was achieved for a minimum of 0.15 FTE CM and 1.23 FTE IPCP per 5000 annual hospital admissions, plus 0.05 FTE CM and 0.41 FTE IPCP per 5000 annual day admissions, respectively. For non-academic hospitals, 92% supported the proposed norm for CM (same values), and 89% agreed with the proposed norm for IPCP: 1.10 FTE per 5000 hospital admissions and 0.37 FTE per 5000 day admissions. ConclusionA new consensus-based staffing norm, endorsed by most Dutch IPC professionals, recommends an increase in IPCP. This reflects increased demands on IPC teams and suggests diversification of professionals working in IPC teams, not accounted for in the previous norm. This minimum norm is needed to effectively protect patients and healthcare workers from infections.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Key factors for effective implementation of healthcare workers support interventions in health organisations after patient safety incidents: a protocol for a scoping review 93%
- Factors affecting healthcare workers' compliance with social and behavioural infection control measures during emerging infectious disease outbreaks: Rapid evidence review. 92%
- High risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline healthcare workers in Northeast Brazil: a respondent-driven sampling approach 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The experience of European hospital-based health care workers on following infection prevention and control procedures for COVID-19 95%
- Risks and challenges in COVID-19 infection prevention and control in a hospital setting: perspectives of healthcare workers in Thailand 93%
- Triaging and Referring In Adjacent General and Emergency Departments (the TRIAGE trial): a cluster randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Regional Variation in the Interpretation of Contact Precautions for Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: a cross-sectional survey 95%
- Cleaning and disinfecting surfaces in hospitals and long-term care facilities for reducing hospital and facility-acquired bacterial and viral infections: A systematic review 92%
- Incidence and outcomes of healthcare-associated COVID-19 infections: significance of delayed diagnosis and correlation with staff absence 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Management of the COVID-19 health crisis: A survey in Swiss hospital pharmacies 93%
- A Systematic Review: The Dimensions and Indicators utilized in the Performance Evaluation of Health Care Organizations- An Implication during COVID-19 Pandemic 93%
- Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Symptoms at presentation for patients admitted to hospital with Covid-19: results from the ISARIC prospective multinational observational study 89%
- Increased risk of death in covid-19 hospital admissions during the second wave as compared to the first epidemic wave. A prospective dynamic cohort study in South London, UK 88%
- Effectiveness, barriers, and facilitating factors of strategies for active delabeling of patients with penicillin allergy labels: a systematic review protocol. 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.