Back

Forward-projected cortical eigenmodes provide an efficient sensor-space representation of resting-state EEG

Park, H. G.

2025-12-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2025.12.08.693061 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sensor-space EEG analyses typically rely on electrode layouts or data-driven components and rarely encode cortical geometry, making scalp patterns difficult to link to anatomy and to compare across participants. We introduce a sensor-space basis dictionary that explicitly integrates cortical geometry. Laplace-Beltrami (LB) eigenmodes are computed on a standard cortical template (fsaverage) and mapped by the lead-field matrix of a three-layer boundary-element (BEM) head model to yield cortex-anchored sensor-space harmonics. The leadfield-mapped LB dictionary spans scalp topographies, while pre-serving a meaningful spatial-frequency ordering inherited from the cortical manifold. We assess representational efficiency using ordinary least squares (OLS) projections of resting EEG (eyes-closed/open) across 59-, 32-, and 19-channel montages, and compare against spherical harmonics (SPH), principal components (PCA), and independent components (ICA). Efficiency is quantified by the variance explained R2(K) (by leading K modes) and the efficiency indices K70 and K90 (fewest modes reaching R2 [≥] 0.70 and 0.90) and reliability by ICC(3,1) of eyes-open/closed coefficients. The cortex-anchored basis shows higher early-K R2 than SPH and PCA (e.g., 59-channel eyes-closed at K=4: LB R2 {approx} 0.56 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.59] vs. SPH {approx} 0.44 [0.42, 0.46], PCA {approx} 0.08 [0.07, 0.09]) and reaches 70% and 90% variance with fewer modes (LB K70 {approx} 8.6; SPH {approx} 12.3; PCA {approx} 19.3; ICA {approx} 22.8; LB K90 {approx} 22.6; SPH {approx} 25.3; PCA {approx} 23.2; ICA {approx} 30.2). Mode-wise coefficient reliability (eyes-open vs. eyes-closed) is comparable between LB and SPH. By combining cortical eigenmodes with a forward head model, this approach yields a geometry-aligned, interpretable representation of sensor-space EEG that offers superior fidelity-complexity trade-offs at small K and a principled scaffold for low-dimensional EEG sensor space analysis.

Published in Brain Topography (predicted rank #14) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.