Forward-projected cortical eigenmodes provide an efficient sensor-space representation of resting-state EEG
Park, H. G.
Show abstract
Sensor-space EEG analyses typically rely on electrode layouts or data-driven components and rarely encode cortical geometry, making scalp patterns difficult to link to anatomy and to compare across participants. We introduce a sensor-space basis dictionary that explicitly integrates cortical geometry. Laplace-Beltrami (LB) eigenmodes are computed on a standard cortical template (fsaverage) and mapped by the lead-field matrix of a three-layer boundary-element (BEM) head model to yield cortex-anchored sensor-space harmonics. The leadfield-mapped LB dictionary spans scalp topographies, while pre-serving a meaningful spatial-frequency ordering inherited from the cortical manifold. We assess representational efficiency using ordinary least squares (OLS) projections of resting EEG (eyes-closed/open) across 59-, 32-, and 19-channel montages, and compare against spherical harmonics (SPH), principal components (PCA), and independent components (ICA). Efficiency is quantified by the variance explained R2(K) (by leading K modes) and the efficiency indices K70 and K90 (fewest modes reaching R2 [≥] 0.70 and 0.90) and reliability by ICC(3,1) of eyes-open/closed coefficients. The cortex-anchored basis shows higher early-K R2 than SPH and PCA (e.g., 59-channel eyes-closed at K=4: LB R2 {approx} 0.56 [95% CI: 0.54, 0.59] vs. SPH {approx} 0.44 [0.42, 0.46], PCA {approx} 0.08 [0.07, 0.09]) and reaches 70% and 90% variance with fewer modes (LB K70 {approx} 8.6; SPH {approx} 12.3; PCA {approx} 19.3; ICA {approx} 22.8; LB K90 {approx} 22.6; SPH {approx} 25.3; PCA {approx} 23.2; ICA {approx} 30.2). Mode-wise coefficient reliability (eyes-open vs. eyes-closed) is comparable between LB and SPH. By combining cortical eigenmodes with a forward head model, this approach yields a geometry-aligned, interpretable representation of sensor-space EEG that offers superior fidelity-complexity trade-offs at small K and a principled scaffold for low-dimensional EEG sensor space analysis.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 95%
- The Individualized Neural Tuning Model: Precise and generalizable cartography of functional architecture in individual brains 95%
- Multiscale Modes of Functional Brain Connectivity 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Precise Spatial Tuning of Visually Driven Alpha Oscillations in Human Visual Cortex 95%
- Coupling of pupil- and neuronal population dynamics reveals diverse influences of arousal on cortical processing 95%
- Different computations over the same inputs produce selective behavior in algorithmic brain networks 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.