Population Genetics of Fluctuating Selection among Individuals (FSI): a New Paradigm of Molecular Evolution
Gu, X.
Show abstract
The FSI (fluctuating selection among individuals) theory of population genetics postulates that the fitness effect of a mutation may fluctuate among individuals with the same genotype (heterozygote or homozygote), whereas the wildtype fitness remains a constant. We conducted a comprehensive population genetic analysis and demonstrated profound impacts on the current wisdom of population genetics and molecular evolution. First, genetic drift induced by FSI, FSI-genetic drift for short, may play an important role in molecular evolution when the Ne-genetic drift is weak, i.e., the effective population size is not very small. Second, FSI toppled the golden-standard of neutrality in molecular evolution: the substitution rate equals to the mutation rate if and only if the mutation is strictly neutral. Instead, the concept of selection-duality claims that, under FSI, slightly beneficial mutations may be subject to a negative selection, resulting in a substitution rate less than the mutations rate. Consequently, there are three types of neutrality under FSI: the fixation neutrality (substitution rate equals to mutation rate), the generic neutrality (the population mean of selection coefficient is zero), and the FSI-neutrality (the midpoint of fixation neutrality and generic neutrality). Intriguingly, our theoretical analysis shows that the null hypothesis ( = 0) of MacDonald-Kreitman (MK) test exactly corresponds to the FSI-neutrality. Rejection of the null that, say, favors the alternative > 0, could lead to two interpretations: when the observed is below a threshold, the selection-duality is favored; otherwise an adaptive evolution is favored. We calculated the threshold for several mammals (human, macaque, lemur and vole), and found that all those observed values (from 3.5% to 29%) were below the threshold and so they be interpreted by the selection duality rather than adaptive evolution.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.